ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine1997
A Dutch population study of the STR loci D21S11 and HUMFIBRA.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To introduce a duplex PCR system consisting of the STR loci D21S11 and HUMFIBRA in forensic identity testing we analysed a Dutch Caucasian database of 205 individuals. The combined power of discrimination of the two loci is 0.9978 and there was no evidence for linkage equilibrium between the two loci (p = 0.91). However, we noticed departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for the D21S11-locus in our database (p = 0.03), but the differences between observed and expected D21S11 allele pair frequencies were of negligible practical significance in forensic calculations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9081234What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.