ArticleIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal1997
Cytogenetic analyses of a murine carcinoma cell line and six metastatic derivatives with different degrees of radioresistability.
Article in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We reported that a murine carcinoma (DEN3) an its six pulmonary metastases (M2, M4C, M4D, M4E, M4F, and M6) exhibited different degrees of radioresistability (In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.26:222-228; 1990). While the M2, M4C, M4E, and M4F cultured cells survived up to 2.5 Gy, the cells of DEN3 and M6 tolerated up to 5.0 Gy, and the M4D cells could withstand up to 10.0 Gy of X-irradiation. In the present investigation, the cytogenetic features of these cell lines were examined: (a) to determine the degree of cytogenetic heterogeneity among these cell lines, and (b) to investigate whether any association between the cytogenetic anomaly and the degree of radioresistability could be established. Heterogeneous cytogenetic aberrations were detected in all of the above lines. Karyotype analysis of the M4D and M6 cell lines displayed both numerical and structural abnormalities. The gain and loss of chromosomal copies were observed. Structural aberrations, such as translocation and deletion appeared in both cell lines. However, correlation between the cytogenetic abnormality and the degree of radioresistability was not demonstrated except for a dramatic reduction in one or more copies of the X-chromosome that occurred in 86% and 93% of the M6 and M4D cells, respectively. The results suggest heterogeneous cytogenetic aberrations among these cell lines and a possible association between the loss of X-chromosome and radioresistability of these tumor cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9081221What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.