Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9073126›Full record

ReviewDigestive diseases and sciences1997

Adaptation of intestinal nutrient transport in health and disease. Part I.

A B Thomson, G Wild

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Digestive diseases and sciences, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Intestinal mucosal adaptation.World journal of gastroenterology · 2006
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A B ThomsonDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
G Wild
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Why is it important to understand the mechanisms controlling intestinal adaptation? There are two major answers to this question. Firstly, in establishing the cellular and molecular events associated with intestinal adaptation, we will formulate a general framework that may be applied to the understanding of adaptation of other cell membranes. For example, alterations in the synthesis of glucose carriers and their subsequent insertion into membranes may alter sugar entry across the intestinal brush border membrane (BBM) using the sodium-dependent D-glucose transporter, SGLT1, or the BBM sodium-independent facultative fructose transporter, GLUT5, and may alter facilitated sugar exit across the basolateral membrane (BLM) using GLUT2. The precise role of transcriptional and translational processes in the up- or down-regulation of sugar transport requires further definition. Alterations in enterocyte microsomal lipid metabolic enzyme expression occurring during the course of intestinal adaptation will direct the synthesis of lipids destined for trafficking to the BBM and BLM domains of the enterocyte. This will subsequently alter the passive permeability properties of these membranes and ultimately influence lipid absorption. Therefore, establishing the physiological, cellular and molecular mechanisms of adaptation in the intestine will define principles that may be applied to other epithelia. Secondly, enterocyte membrane adaptation is subject to dietary modification, and these may be exploited as a means to enhance a beneficial or to reduce a detrimental aspect of the intestinal adaptive process in disease states. Alterations in membrane function occur in association with changes in dietary lipids, and these are observed in a variety of cells and tissues including lymphocytes, testes, liver, adipocytes, nerve tissue, nuclear envelope and mitochondria. Therefore, the elucidation of the mechanisms of intestinal adaptation and the manner whereby dietary manipulation modulates these processes affords the future possibility of dietary engineering aimed at using food as a therapeutic agent. It is hoped this approach will form the centerpiece for future investigation that would focus on disease prevention, as well as on the development of better therapeutic strategies to prevent the development or to treat the complications of conditions such as diabetes mellitus, obesity, hyperlipidemia and inflammatory bowel diseases. This review deals with the physiology of glucose transport with specific emphasis on transporters of the brush border membrane (BBM) and the basolateral membrane (BLM). On the BBM the sodium (Na)/glucose transporters (SGLT1 and SGLT2), the Na-independent transporter (GLUT5), and on the BLM the hexose transporter (GLUT2) are discussed. The molecular biology of these transporters is also reviewed.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsBiological TransportHumansIntestinal AbsorptionIntestinal DiseasesIntestinesNutritional Physiological PhenomenaSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID9073126
OpenAlexW1787039286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.