Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9069488›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry1997

Gadolinium enhanced MRI predicts clinical and MRI disease activity in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

T Koudriavtseva, A J Thompson, M Fiorelli, C Gasperini, S Bastianello, A Bozzao, A Paolillo, A Pisani, S Galgani, C Pozzilli

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Conversion from radiologically isolated syndrome to multiple sclerosis.International journal of preventive medicine · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Enhancing patterns in multiple sclerosis: evolution and persistence.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2001
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

T KoudriavtsevaDepartment of Neurological Sciences, University of Rome La Sapienza, Italy.
A J Thompson
M Fiorelli
C Gasperini
S Bastianello
A Bozzao
A Paolillo
A Pisani
S Galgani
C Pozzilli

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the predictive power of baseline gadolinium (Gd) enhanced MRI in relation to subsequent clinical and MRI activity. Sixty eight patients with clinically definite relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis had a baseline Gd enhanced MRI and were followed up clinically and by monthly Gd enhanced MRI for six months. The occurrence of relapses during the follow up period was predicted by the presence of at least one enhancing lesion on the baseline MRI (P < 0.05). The number and volume of enhancing lesions at baseline were significantly associated with both enhancing lesions observed during the follow up period (P < 0.0001) and the accumulation of abnormality on T2 weighted images (P < 0.0001). Moreover, the presence of three or more enhancing lesions at baseline scan was consistently associated with the development of permanent abnormalities on T2 weighted images six months later. The study suggests that the number and volume of Gd enhancing lesions at a single examination are strong short term predictors of subsequent clinical and MRI activity.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultBrainChi-Square DistributionCross-Over StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGadoliniumHumansImage EnhancementMaleMultiple SclerosisOdds RatioPredictive Value of TestsRecurrenceRegression AnalysisGadolinium

Identifiers

PMID9069488
PMCPMC1064162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.