Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9061638›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology1997

Mechanism of memantine block of NMDA-activated channels in rat retinal ganglion cells: uncompetitive antagonism.

H S Chen, S A Lipton

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02144584 (Pilot Study of Memantine for Enhanced Stroke Recovery), which is not on this map. Cited by 105 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02144584 early_phase1active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Study of Memantine for Enhanced Stroke Recovery

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2014 to 2027Enrolled20ConditionsIschemic Stroke, Upper Extremity WeaknessArmsMemantine XR, Placebo (for memantine)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 285 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Structural insights into function of ionotropic glutamate receptors.Biochemistry (Moscow) Supplement. Series A, Membrane and cell biology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H S ChenLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Children's Hospital and Program in Neuroscience, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
S A Lipton
Boston Children's Hospital · US

Funding

PROJECT III - GENETIC APPROACH TO EXCITATORY TRANSMISSIONP01HD029587 · NICHD · SCINTILLON INSTITUTE FOR PHOTOBIOLOGY · PI LIPTON, STUART A · 1992 to 2016
$21.9M
RETINAL GANGLION CELLS: ION CHANNEL &TRANSMITTERSR01EY005477 · NEI · SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE · PI LIPTON, STUART A · 1985 to 2010
$5.0M
CA++ CHANNEL ANTAGONISTS AND AIDS-RELATED NEUROTOXICITYR01EY009024 · NEI · SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE · PI LIPTON, STUART A · 1991 to 2009
$3.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY05477NEI NIH HHS R01 EY09024NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD29587
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA)-activated currents were recorded from dissociated rat retinal ganglion cells using whole-cell recording. The NMDA open-channel blocking drug memantine was evaluated for non-competitive and/or uncompetitive components of antagonism. A rapid superfusion system was used to apply various drugs for kinetic analysis. 2. Dose-response data revealed that memantine blocked 200 microM NMDA-evoked responses with a 50% inhibition constant (IC50) of approximately 1 microM at -60 mV and an empirical Hill coefficient of approximately 1. The antagonism followed a bimolecular reaction process. This 1:1 stoichiometry is supported by the fact that the macroscopic blocking rate of memantine (kon) increased linearly with memantine concentration and the macroscopic unblocking rate (koff) was independent of it. The estimated pseudo-first order rate constant for macroscopic blockade was 4 x 10(5) M-1 S-1 and the rate constant for unblocking was 0.44 s-1. Both the blocking and unblocking actions of memantine were well fitted by a single exponential process. 3. The kon for 2 microM memantine decreased with decreasing concentrations of NMDA. By analysing kon behaviour, we estimate that memantine has minimal interaction with the closed-unliganded state of the channel. As channel open probability (Po) approached zero, a small residual action of memantine may be explained by the presence of endogenous glutamate and glycine. 4. Memantine could be trapped within the NMDA-gated channel if it was suddenly closed by fast washout of agonist. The measured gating process of channel activation and deactivation appeared at least 10-20-fold faster than the kinetics of memantine action. By combining the agonist and voltage dependence of antagonism, a trapping scheme was established for further kinetic analysis. 5. With low agonist concentrations, NMDA-gated channels recovered slowly from memantine blockade. By analysing the probability of a channel remaining blocked, we found that memantine binding appeared to stabilize the open conformation of the blocked channel and did not affect ligand affinity. Validity of the "trapping model' and stabilization of the open conformation were further suggested by agreement between the predicted dose-response curve for NMDA in the presence of 2 microM memantine and the empirically derived dose-response relationship. 6. Based on simple molecular schemes, the degree of blockade at various concentrations of agonist for "pure' non-competitive vs. uncompetitive inhibition was computer simulated. The measured degree of blockade by 6 microM memantine was close to ideal for pure uncompetitive antagonism. Taken together, we conclude that the predominant mechanism of open-channel blockade by memantine is uncompetitive. In general, the relative magnitude of the dissociation rate of an open-channel blocker from the open but blocked channel (the apparent off-rate) compared with the rate of leaving the closed and blocker-trapped state (the leak rate) will determine the contribution of uncompetitive vs. non-competitive actions, respectively. 7. Millimolar internal Cs+ competed with memantine for binding in the NMDA-gated channel, and reduced the association rate of memantine, but had no effect on the voltage dependence of the dissociation rate. After removal of Cs+, the calculated Ki for memantine remained voltage dependent. These observations would be difficult to reconcile with models in which memantine binds to a site outside the channel pore and instead strongly support the supposition that the blocking site for memantine is within the permeation pathway.

Indexed as

AnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugIon ChannelsMemantineN-MethylaspartatePatch-Clamp TechniquesRatsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateRetinal Ganglion CellsIon ChannelsMemantineN-MethylaspartateReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID9061638
PMCPMC1159335
OpenAlexW2056560960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.