Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9053729›Full record

ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology1995

New insights on P2X purinoceptors.

P P Humphrey, G Buell, I Kennedy, B S Khakh, A D Michel, A Surprenant, D J Trezise

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Small molecule inhibition of RISC loading.ACS chemical biology · 2012
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Purine and pyrimidine (P2) receptors as drug targets.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2002
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Allosteric control of gating and kinetics at P2X(4) receptor channels.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 1999
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P P HumphreyDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, UK.
G Buell
I Kennedy
B S Khakh
A D Michel
A Surprenant
D J Trezise
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant advances in understanding of P2X purinoceptor pharmacology have been made in the last few years. The limitations of nucleotide agonists as drug tools have now been amply demonstrated. Fortunately, inhibitors of the degrading ecto-ATPase enzymes are becoming available and it has become apparent that the complete removal of all divalent cations can be used experimentally in some systems to prevent nucleotide breakdown. Despite these issues, convincing evidence for P2X receptor heterogeneity, from data with agonists, has recently been reported. A number of new antagonists at P2X purinoceptors have also recently been described which to some degree appear to be more specific and useful than earlier antagonists like suramin. It is now apparent that suramin is a poor antagonist of ATP in many tissues because it potently inhibits ATPase activity at similar concentrations to those at which it blocks the P2X purinoceptor. Advances in the use of radiolabelled nucleotides as radioligands for binding studies has allowed the demonstration of P2X purinoceptors in a variety of tissues throughout the body including the brain. These studies have also provided evidence for receptor heterogeneity. Excitingly, two P2X purinoceptor genes have been cloned but operational studies suggest that more than two types exist. The cloning studies have also demonstrated a unique structure for the P2X purinoceptor which differentiates it from all other ligand-gated ion channel receptors. Further studies on P2X purinoceptor operation and structure are needed to help resolve controversies alluded to regarding the characterization and classification of nucleotide receptors. Hopefully such studies will also lead to a better understanding of the physiological and pathological importance of ATP and its activation of P2X purinoceptors. This will require the identification of better drug tools, in particular antagonists which may also provide the basis for novel therapeutic agents.

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphateAnimalsDNA, ComplementaryElectrophysiologyHumansIon ChannelsPurinergic P2 Receptor AgonistsPurinergic P2 Receptor AntagonistsRadioligand AssayReceptors, Purinergic P2Structure-Activity RelationshipAdenosine TriphosphateDNA, ComplementaryIon ChannelsPurinergic P2 Receptor AgonistsPurinergic P2 Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, Purinergic P2

Identifiers

PMID9053729
OpenAlexW2081318744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.