ArticleThe Journal of physiology1997
Exotoxin-insensitive G proteins mediate synaptically evoked muscarinic sodium current in rabbit sympathetic neurones.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Encoding properties induced by a persistent voltage-gated muscarinic sodium current in rabbit sympathetic neurones.The Journal of physiology · 1998Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. The involvement of G proteins in the transduction pathway that links muscarinic receptors to the low-threshold voltage-dependent sodium current (INa,M) was studied in neurones from intact sympathetic prevertebral ganglia using the whole-cell configuration of the patch-clamp technique. Experiments were performed in the presence of the nicotinic receptor antagonists hexamethonium (50 microM) and d-tubocurarine (50 microM). 2. INa,M was activated by either bath-applying muscarinic agonists or stimulating the preganglionic splanchnic nerves. Synaptically and agonist-mediated INa,M did not display significant run-down or changes in their properties in cells tested, irrespective of whether the pipette solutions contained GTP. 3. Dialysis of sympathetic neurones with GDP beta S (500-750 microM) decreased the amplitude of INa,M by approximately 65% compared with control neurones within 30 min. 4. In the absence of muscarinic receptor stimulation, intracellular dialysis with GTP gamma S (500 microM) for 10 min slowly and slightly (20-25%) activated INa,M. GTP gamma S dialysis markedly slowed down the decay of INa,M after its transient activation with carbachol pulses (10-20 s) or nerve stimulation (3-5 s). The INa,M activation became fully irreversible 2.9 min after the start of GTP gamma S dialysis. Dialysing cells with the G protein activator AIF4-led to a rapid but transient activation of INa,M. 5. Synaptically and agonist-evoked INa,M were not affected in ganglia treated with 0.5-1 microgram ml-1 pertussis toxin (PTX) for 7-24 h at 37 degrees C. Control experiments showed that this treatment severely reduced the PTX-sensitive inhibition of N-type calcium currents induced by carbachol (CCh) and noradrenaline. Application of NEM (N-ethylmaleimide) for 2 min depressed the INa,M evoked in response to bath-applied CCh by only 27%. 6. Incubating ganglia with 5-10 micrograms ml-1 of cholera toxin for 7 h had no effect on the carbachol-induced INa,M but greatly potentiated (approximately 250%) the synaptically evoked INa,M, presumably via a presynaptic mechanism. 7. These results show that the coupling between muscarinic receptors and NaM channels is mediated by pertussis toxin- and cholera toxin-insensitive G proteins, possibly of the Gq/11 or G12 class.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.