Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9044166›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics1996

Pharmacokinetic considerations of regional administration and drug targeting: influence of site of input in target tissue and flux of binding protein.

M Rowland, A McLachlan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Drug structure-transport relationships.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2010
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M RowlandDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
A McLachlan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hunt et al. introduced the concept of the Drug Targeting Index (DTI) to quantify the gain associated with regional drug administration and targeting and showed that for the ideal case of all drug first reaching the target DTI = l + CLs/(QT(l-ET)) where CL, is the total clearance of drug from the body (including the target tissue). QT is the target blood flow and ET is the steady-state extraction ratio of the drug in the target. In the model they portrayed the tissue as a homogeneous organ. A more general pharmacokinetic model has been developed that takes into account the three anatomical spaces (vascular, interstitial, and intracellular) of the target organ or tissue and that, in addition to unbound drug permeating the vascular and cellular membranes, protein-bound drug can also flux between the vascular and interstitial spaces. Elimination of unbound drug can take place from the cellular and interstitial spaces. An important parameter influencing the DTI is shown to be the fraction of targeted dose that is eliminated there before it reaches the systemic circulation, fT. Equations have been developed showing the relationship between fT and ET and for DTI when drug is administered at the various sites within the tissue and under a variety of conditions. Only when drug is administered into the target arterial blood stream or when distribution of drug within the target tissue is perfusion rate-limited, does fT = ET and DTI = 1 + CLs/x (QT (I - ET)). Otherwise consideration needs to be given to the permeabilities of both the unbound and bound drug and site of target administration, interstitial or intracellular. Then fT is greater than ET and DTI is greater than that expected had perfusion-rate limited distribution prevailed. The maximum benefit in DTI is seen for a drug of low cellular permeability but high cellular intrinsic clearance administered intracellularly.

Indexed as

PharmacokineticsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansModels, BiologicalProtein Binding

Identifiers

PMID9044166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.