ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics1996
Pharmacokinetic considerations of regional administration and drug targeting: influence of site of input in target tissue and flux of binding protein.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- When to consider intra-target microdosing: physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling approach to quantitatively identify key factors for observing target engagement.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Drug structure-transport relationships.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2010Review
- Delivery of neurotrophic factors to the central nervous system: pharmacokinetic considerations.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2001Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hunt et al. introduced the concept of the Drug Targeting Index (DTI) to quantify the gain associated with regional drug administration and targeting and showed that for the ideal case of all drug first reaching the target DTI = l + CLs/(QT(l-ET)) where CL, is the total clearance of drug from the body (including the target tissue). QT is the target blood flow and ET is the steady-state extraction ratio of the drug in the target. In the model they portrayed the tissue as a homogeneous organ. A more general pharmacokinetic model has been developed that takes into account the three anatomical spaces (vascular, interstitial, and intracellular) of the target organ or tissue and that, in addition to unbound drug permeating the vascular and cellular membranes, protein-bound drug can also flux between the vascular and interstitial spaces. Elimination of unbound drug can take place from the cellular and interstitial spaces. An important parameter influencing the DTI is shown to be the fraction of targeted dose that is eliminated there before it reaches the systemic circulation, fT. Equations have been developed showing the relationship between fT and ET and for DTI when drug is administered at the various sites within the tissue and under a variety of conditions. Only when drug is administered into the target arterial blood stream or when distribution of drug within the target tissue is perfusion rate-limited, does fT = ET and DTI = 1 + CLs/x (QT (I - ET)). Otherwise consideration needs to be given to the permeabilities of both the unbound and bound drug and site of target administration, interstitial or intracellular. Then fT is greater than ET and DTI is greater than that expected had perfusion-rate limited distribution prevailed. The maximum benefit in DTI is seen for a drug of low cellular permeability but high cellular intrinsic clearance administered intracellularly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9044166What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.