ArticleImmunology1997
Binding of human and rat CD59 to the terminal complement complexes.
Article in Immunology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Glycation of the complement regulatory protein CD59 is a novel biomarker for glucose handling in humans.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2014Trial
- Role of Complement in a Rat Model of Paclitaxel-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2018Article
- Chronic low level complement activation within the eye is controlled by intraocular complement regulatory proteins.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2000Article
- Production and functional characterization of a soluble recombinant form of mouse CD59.Immunology · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
CD59-antigen (protectin) is a widely distributed glycolipid-anchored inhibitor of complement lysis. CD59 interacts with complement components C8 and C9 during assembly of the membrane attack complex (MAC). To evaluate species specificity of these interactions we have in the present study examined cross-species binding of isolated human and rat CD59 to the terminal complement components C8 and C9. By using primarily soluble CD59 isolated from urine (CD59U) potentially non-specific binding interactions of the phospholipid portion of the membrane forms of CD59 could be avoided. Sucrose density gradient ultracentrifugation analysis showed that human CD59U bound to both human and rat C8 in the SC5b-8 complexes. Similar binding occurred when rat CD59U was used. The degree of binding did not significantly differ between the heterologous and homologous CD59-C8 combinations. C9 from both species inhibited the binding of CD59 to soluble SC5b-8. In ligand blotting analysis human and rat CD59U bound to human and rat C8 alpha gamma-subunit and C9. Binding of human and rat CD59U was stronger to human than rat C9. In plate binding assays the erythrocyte form of CD59 (CD59E) bound to both human and rat C8. Binding of CD59E to heterologous C9 was considerably weaker than to homologous C9. Our results imply that the reciprocal binding sites between C8 and CD59 and to a lesser degree between CD59 and C9 are conserved between human and rat. Interactions of CD59 with the terminal C components are thus species selective but not 'homologously restricted'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.