Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9034566›Full record

ReviewBrain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland)1997

Cerebral malaria.

G Turner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Disseminated intravascular coagulation in malaria: A case report.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

G TurnerOxford Centre for Tropical Medicine. 179GAR@chiron.wits.ac.za

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malaria infection of the Central Nervous System (CNS) can cause a severe neurological syndrome termed Cerebral Malaria (CM). The central neuropathological feature of CM is the preferential sequestration of parasitised red blood cells (PRBC) in the cerebral microvasculature. The level of sequestration is related to the incidence of cerebral symptoms in severe malaria. Other neuropathological features of CM include petechial hemorrhages in the brain parenchyma, ring hemorrhages and Dürck's granuloma's. Immunohisto-chemical and electron microscopy studies have shown widespread cerebral endothelial cell activation and morphological changes occur in CM, as well as focal endothelial cell damage and necrosis. The immune cell response to intravascular sequestration appears to be limited, although activation of pigment-phagocytosing monocytes is a late feature. The mechanisms by which PRBC cause coma in malaria remain unclear. In vitro parasitised erythrocytes bind to endothelial cells by specific, receptor mediated interactions with host adhesion molecules such as ICAM-1, whose expression on cerebral endothelial cells is increased during CM as part of a systemic endothelial activation. Induction of local neuro-active mediators such as nitric oxide and systemic cytokines like TNF alpha may be responsible for the rapidly reversible symptoms of the coma of CM. The recent cloning of the parasite ligand PfEMP-1, thought to mediate binding to host sequestration receptors, promises further insight into the relationship between patterns of sequestration and the incidence and pathogenesis of coma in cerebral malaria.

Indexed as

BrainBrain EdemaCell CountCerebral HemorrhageHumansIschemic Attack, TransientMalaria, CerebralNeuronsSyndrome

Identifiers

PMID9034566
PMCPMC8098241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.