Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9033277›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of pathology1997

Human sunlight-induced basal-cell-carcinoma-associated dendritic cells are deficient in T cell co-stimulatory molecules and are impaired as antigen-presenting cells.

F O Nestle, G Burg, J Fäh, T Wrone-Smith, B J Nickoloff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of pathology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 170 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Innate Immune Cells and Their Contribution to T-Cell-Based Immunotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Dendritic cells based immunotherapy.American journal of cancer research · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F O NestleDepartment of Dermatology, University of Zurich Medical School, Switzerland.
G Burg
J Fäh
T Wrone-Smith
B J Nickoloff
University of Zurich · CH

Funding

DERMAL DENDROCYTES AND AIDS-RELATED PSORIASISR01AR040488 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI NICKOLOFF, BRIAN J · 1991 to 1993
–
IMMUNOBIOLOGY OF KAPOSIS SARCOMA TUMOR CELLSR01CA063928 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI NICKOLOFF, BRIAN J · 1994 to 1998
–
NCI NIH HHS CA63928NIAMS NIH HHS AR40488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune surveillance of skin cancer involves the stimulation of effector T cells by tumor-derived antigens and antigen-presenting cells (APCs). An effective APC must not only display processed antigen in the context of MHC molecules but also express co-stimulatory molecules that are required to fully activate T cells. One of the most common cutaneous neoplasms is basal cell carcinoma. To investigate expression of the co-stimulatory molecules CD80 (B7-1) and CD86 (B7-2) on tumor-associated dendritic cells (TADCs), cryosections from basal cell carcinomas were immunostained. In basal cell carcinomas, only 1 to 2% of intratumor and 5 to 10% of peritumor APCs expressed CD80 or CD86. In contrast, biopsies of immunological/inflammatory dermatoses revealed that 38 to 73% of APCs expressed CD80 and CD86. To further evaluate their phenotype and function, TADCs were isolated from tissue samples of basal cell carcinomas; they were non-adherent to plastic, displayed a typical dendritic morphology, and expressed high levels of major histocompatibility class II molecules on their surface. When TADCs were compared with dendritic cells from blood for presentation of superantigens (staphylococcal enterotoxins A and B) to resting autologous T cells, TADCs were consistently weaker stimulators of T cell proliferation than blood dendritic cells. When analyzed by flow cytometry, TADCs expressed high levels of HLA-DR, but only 5 to 10% co-expressed CD80 or CD86. A 3-day culture in granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor-containing medium partially reconstituted the TADC expression of CD80 and CD86 as well as their immunostimulatory capacity. Thus, in this common skin cancer, although there are prominent collections of HLA-DR-positive APCs in and around tumor cells, the TADCs are deficient in important co-stimulatory molecules as well as being weak stimulators of T cell proliferation. The paucity of co-stimulatory molecule expression and functional activity of TADCs may explain why the local T lymphocytic infiltrate fails to become fully activated to eradicate adjacent tumor cells. From a clinical perspective, these findings suggest a novel immunotherapeutic strategy targeting T cell co-stimulatory molecules on professional APCs in cutaneous oncology.

Indexed as

Neoplasms, Radiation-InducedAntigen-Presenting CellsAntigens, CDB7-1 AntigenB7-2 AntigenBasal Cell CarcinomaDendritic CellsHLA-DR AntigensHumansMembrane GlycoproteinsSkin NeoplasmsSunlightT-LymphocytesAntigens, CDB7-1 AntigenB7-2 AntigenCD86 protein, humanHLA-DR AntigensMembrane Glycoproteins

Identifiers

PMID9033277
PMCPMC1858265
OpenAlexW59301961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.