ArticleThe American journal of pathology1997
The structural basis of molecular genetic deletions. An integration of classical cytogenetic and molecular analyses in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Article in The American journal of pathology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Telomeres are shortened in acinar-to-ductal metaplasia lesions associated with pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia but not in isolated acinar-to-ductal metaplasias.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2011Article
- Telomere shortening is nearly universal in pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia.The American journal of pathology · 2002Article
- Article
- Identification of three distinct regions of allelic deletions on the short arm of chromosome 8 in hepatocellular carcinoma.Oncogene · 1999Article
- Periampullary adenocarcinoma: analysis of 5-year survivors.Annals of surgery · 1998Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Molecular genetic alterations are known to be important in human carcinoma, but the structural basis of these changes is largely unknown. To examine the basis of these changes, we compared the karyotypic chromosomal abnormalities of primary pancreatic adenocarcinomas with the molecular changes identified in these same cancers. In 14 cancers with abnormal karyotypes, 65% (123 of 188) of the chromosomal arms with molecular loss of heterozygosity (LOH) were associated with karyotypic structural anomalies. Karyotypic changes accounting for these molecular allelic losses included 83 chromosome losses, 18 partial deletions, nine isochromosomes, eight additions, and five translocations. Eight bomozygous deletions were also identified by molecular analyses. Of the three homozygous deletions identified at 9p21, the only karyotypic change was a single case in which one entire copy of chromosome 9 was deleted. Of the four homozygous deletions identified at 18q21.1, one showed a loss of both copies of chromosome 18, two showed a loss of one copy of chromosome 18, and the fourth had two structurally normal copies of chromosome 18. One homozygous deletion was identified at 13q12.3, and the karyotype revealed the loss of one entire copy of chromosome 13. The second copy of chromosome 13 in this carcinoma was structurally normal. These results indicate that chromosomal structural anomalies can account for two-thirds of the LOH in pancreatic adenocarcinomas and that most homozygous deletions are likely to be interstitial chromosomal deletions that are below the detection limit of conventional karyotypic analyses. Some of the molecular deletions detected as LOH on chromosomes with karyotypically normal structure can be explained by chromosomal loss with reduplication of the remaining chromosome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9033253PMC1858276W195387175What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.