Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9028828›Full record

ReviewIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal1997

Stem cells of the respiratory epithelium and their in vitro cultivation.

M Emura

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Human embryonic stem cells and lung regeneration.British journal of pharmacology · 2008
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Stem cells in the lung.Methods in enzymology · 2006
    Review
  9. [Techniques for functional tissue and organ replacement using postnatal stem cells].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2005
    Review
  10. Pulmonary epithelial stem cells.Cell proliferation · 2004
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Mammary epithelial stem cells: our current understanding.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 1999
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

M EmuraInstitute of Experimental Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parenchymal (epithelial or mesenchyma) stem cells are rapidly drawing both scientific and clinical attention in solid organs like the liver, skin, intestine and abdominal mesothelium, just as has been the case in the hematopoietic system. For the stem cells of these organs various definitions, markers for identification, methods of isolation and in vitro cultivation, and lineage mechanisms have been proposed and some of them are now proven to be valid and useful. In this article attempts will be made to explore whether there are stem cells in the lower respiratory system (from the trachea to the lung periphery) and what they look like. Because of its anatomical and functional complexity the stem cell concept for the respiratory system has been developing rather slowly. Nevertheless, the data available seem to indicate that in analogy to the above mentioned organs there is only one type of epithelial stem cells throughout all sections of the lower respiratory system during fetal through adult stages. They are multipotent for cell differentiation and able to yield lineage progenitors for ciliated, goblet, basal. Clara neuroendocrine, alveolar type 1 and alveolar type 2 cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsCells, CulturedEpithelial CellsHumansRespiratory SystemStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID9028828
OpenAlexW2006772665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.