Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9028742›Full record

ReviewDrugs1997

Physiology of chemotherapy-induced emesis and antiemetic therapy. Predictive models for evaluation of new compounds.

C Veyrat-Follet, R Farinotti, J L Palmer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Suppression of Cisplatin-Induced Vomiting byFrontiers in pharmacology · 2018
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Identification of a novel marker associated with risk for delayed chemotherapy-induced vomiting.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2012
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C Veyrat-FolletLaboratoire GlaxoWellcome, Unité de Biocinétique, Evereux, France.
R Farinotti
J L Palmer
Université Paris-Sud · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The physiology of emesis has been studied for several hundred years, focusing on the different centres involved and the mechanics of expulsion. The vomiting centre receives inputs from various emetic detectors such as the gut, the vestibular labyrinths and the chemoreceptor trigger zone. Emesis is a common disabling effect in motion sickness, postoperative conditions and in radio- and chemotherapy. Our current understanding of the mechanisms has been provided mainly by the recent introduction of serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists into therapeutic use. Nevertheless, despite the considerable advances made in the understanding of the different pathways involved in emesis, there are number of areas that still require experimental investigation. Different animal and human models are available to study the physiology of emesis and to evaluate the antiemetic activity of new compounds, but they need to be predictors of clinical situations.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsDisease Models, AnimalDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansNauseaPredictive Value of TestsVomitingAntiemeticsAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID9028742
OpenAlexW1970239727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.