ArticlePflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology1995
Single-channel analysis of two types of Na+ currents in rat dorsal root ganglia.
Article in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Noise Enhances Action Potential Generation in Mouse Sensory Neurons via Stochastic Resonance.PloS one · 2016Article
- Voltage-clamp and current-clamp recordings from mammalian DRG neurons.Nature protocols · 2009Article
- The effects of neuroleptics on the GABA-induced Cl- current in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons: differences between some neuroleptics.British journal of pharmacology · 2002Article
- Electrophysiological properties of sodium current subtypes in small cells from adult rat dorsal root ganglia.The Journal of physiology · 1998Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The properties of voltage-gated Na+ channels were studied in neurones isolated from rat dorsal root ganglia using the outside-out configuration of the patch-clamp technique. Two types of single-channel currents were identified from the difference in unit amplitudes. Neither type was evoked in the medium in which extracellular Na+ ions were replaced by an equimolar amount of tetramethylammonium ions. The two types of single-channel currents differed in their sensitivity to tetrodotoxin (TTX). The smaller channel current was insensitive to 1 microM TTX (referred to as TTX-I), while the larger channel current was blocked by 1 nM TTX (TTX-S). The unit amplitudes measured during a step depolarization to -30 mV (1.4 mM internal and 250 mM external Na+ concentrations) were 1.16 pA for TTX-S and 0.57 pA for TTX-I, respectively. The slope conductance measured at -30 mV was 16.3 pS for TTX-S and 8.5 pS for TTX-I. TTX-S could be activated by step depolarizations positive to -60 mV, while TTX-I could be activated at potentials positive to -40 mV. When the test pulse was preceded by a depolarizing prepulse, the prepulse positive to -50 mV preferentially inactivated TTX-S with a minimal effect on TTX-I. Activation and inactivation time courses of the averaged ensemble currents computed from TTX-S showed remarkable resemblances to the time courses of the macroscopic TTX-sensitive Na+ current. Similarly, the ensemble currents of TTX-I mimicked the macroscopic TTX-insensitive Na+ current. It was concluded that the two types of Na+ channels in rat dorsal root ganglia differ not only in their sensitivity to TTX, but also in their single-channel conductances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.