Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9024630›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development1997

Cdks and the Drosophila cell cycle.

P J Follette, P H O'Farrell

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Cardiac progenitors and the embryonic cell cycle.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2007
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P J FolletteDepartment of Biochemistry & Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, California 94143-0448 USA. follette@cgl.ucsf.edu
P H O'Farrell
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

MOLECULAR DETERMINANTS OF DEVELOPMENTAL FATER01GM037193 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI O'FARRELL, PATRICK H · 1986 to 2009
$4.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM037193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cyclin-dependent kinases play essential roles in driving the cell cycle. Much progress has been made in Drosophila over the past year in identifying the specific requirements for individual cyclins in particular cell cycle events. These studies encompass many aspects of the cell cycle, from the addition of a G1 phase to the cell cycle during embryogenesis to the role of cyclin degradation in progression through anaphase.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CycleCyclin-Dependent KinasesDrosophilaCyclin-Dependent Kinases

Identifiers

PMID9024630
PMCPMC2753438
OpenAlexW2046488112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.