Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9023123›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research1997

Transcriptional modulation of viral reporter gene constructs following induction of the cellular stress response.

J M Andrews, G C Newbound, M D Lairmore

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J M AndrewsCenter for Retrovirus Research and Department of Veterinary Biosciences, The Arthur James Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. jan_andrews@ncsu.edu
G C Newbound
M D Lairmore
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS AI01190
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we report that commonly used methods of transient transfection induce the cellular stress response and a recovery period is required following transfection when analyzing cellular stress responsive genes. Four transfection methods were examined for their ability to induce the stress response by measuring the expression of heat shock protein (hsp) 72. We demonstrate that electroporation increases expression of hsp 72 in HUT 78 cells. Additionally, DEAE-dextran and liposome-mediated transfection resulted in increased hsp 72 expression in an adherent cell line (HeLa). Liposome-mediated transfection differentially induced cell stress, dependent on the transfection time in serum-free culture conditions. The stress responsiveness of two viral promoters, the HTLV-1 long terminal repeat and CMV immediate early transcriptional unit were examined. We found the maximal stress-mediated enhancement of transcription with both promoters did not occur until the cells recovered for 24 h following transfection.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationHeat-Shock ResponseTranscription, GeneticCytomegalovirusElectroporationGenes, ReporterHeat-Shock ProteinsHeLa CellsHSP72 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansHuman T-lymphotropic virus 1LiposomesPromoter Regions, GeneticTransfectionTumor Cells, CulturedHeat-Shock ProteinsHSP72 Heat-Shock ProteinsLiposomes

Identifiers

PMID9023123
PMCPMC146533
OpenAlexW2166994948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.