Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9021521›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical laboratory analysis1997

Molecular genetic testing for adult-onset disorders: the evolving laboratory, physician, patient interface.

R T Acton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genetics educational needs in China: physicians' experience and knowledge of genetic testing.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2015
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

R T ActonDepartment of Microbiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham 35294-4400, USA.

Funding

PREDICTING GESTATIONAL AND SUBSEQUENT OVERT DIABETESR01DK032767 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ACTON, RONALD T. · 1986 to 1998
–
DS NIH HHS NINDS26795NIDDK NIH HHS NIDDK32767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular genetics is providing the power to predict and diagnose a variety of diseases. This is an evolving field, with new information being gained at a very rapid rate. Ultimately the molecular tools should be available to prevent and/or cure a number of diseases with genetic etiology. The molecular genetics laboratory is playing a pivotal role in effecting the utilization of this technology. However, molecular genetic testing is in many ways unlike other clinical laboratory testing. The process of molecular genetic testing and counseling is complex. The laboratory offering molecular genetic testing must be able to assess pedigrees, decide the proper test to perform and provide interpretation of the tests results obtained. Although standards governing the use of high-complexity genetic tests are evolving it is clear that the laboratory offering these tests will have to have on staff personnel trained specifically in molecular genetics. The challenge will be to stay abreast of evolving technology as well as standards and recommendations governing the use of these tests. We will review the process of molecular genetic testing and the issues that must be considered by laboratories who offer these tests.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingAccreditationGenetic Diseases, InbornHumansInformation SystemsLaboratoriesMedical Laboratory PersonnelMolecular BiologyPedigree

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.