Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9020486›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer1997

Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization improves the detection of malignant cells in effusions from breast cancer patients.

N Zojer, M Fiegl, J Angerler, L Müllauer, A Gsur, S Roka, M Pecherstorfer, H Huber, J Drach

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N ZojerFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Clinical Oncology, University of Vienna, Austria.
M Fiegl
J Angerler
L Müllauer
A Gsur
S Roka
M Pecherstorfer
H Huber
J Drach
University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In diagnostic evaluation of effusions, difficulties are encountered when atypical reactive mesothelial cells have to be differentiated from malignant cells. We tested the impact of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to identify metastatic cells in breast cancer effusions by detection of numerical chromosomal changes. Pleural and ascitic fluid samples (n=57) from 41 breast cancer patients were concomitantly evaluated by routine cytology and FISH, using centromere-specific probes representing chromosomes 7, 11, 12, 17 and 18. After setting stringent cut-off levels deduced from non-malignant control effusions (n=9), the rates of cells with true aneuploidy were determined in each effusion sample from breast cancer patients. The occurrence of aneuploid cells, as detected by FISH and indicative of malignancy, was correlated with the cytological findings. Routine cytology revealed malignancy in 60% of effusions. Using FISH, aneuploid cell populations could be observed in 94% of cytologically positive and in 48% of cytologically negative effusions, thus reverting diagnosis to malignancy. To confirm malignancy in cases with a low frequency of aneuploid cells, two-colour FISH was additionally performed and indeed showed heterogeneous chromosomal aneuploidy within single nuclei. We conclude that FISH is a valuable tool in the diagnosis of malignancy and may serve as an adjunct to routine cytological examination, as demonstrated here for breast cancer effusions.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, HumanAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAneuploidyAscitesBreast NeoplasmsCentromereChromosome MappingChromosomes, Human, Pair 11Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17Chromosomes, Human, Pair 18Chromosomes, Human, Pair 7FemaleHumansIn Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence

Identifiers

PMID9020486
PMCPMC2063365
OpenAlexW1977471760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.