ArticleBritish journal of cancer1997
Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization improves the detection of malignant cells in effusions from breast cancer patients.
Article in British journal of cancer, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Flow cytometry, molecular analysis, and other special techniques (in Serous Fluid Cytopathology).CytoJournal · 2022Review
- Chromosomal abnormalities in non-small cell lung carcinomas and in bronchial epithelia of high-risk smokers detected by multi-target interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2003Article
- Sensitive fluorescent in situ hybridisation method for the characterisation of breast cancer cells in bone marrow aspirates.Molecular pathology : MP · 1999Article
- Chromosomal imbalances in primary and metastatic pancreatic carcinoma as detected by interphase cytogenetics: basic findings and clinical aspects.British journal of cancer · 1998Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In diagnostic evaluation of effusions, difficulties are encountered when atypical reactive mesothelial cells have to be differentiated from malignant cells. We tested the impact of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to identify metastatic cells in breast cancer effusions by detection of numerical chromosomal changes. Pleural and ascitic fluid samples (n=57) from 41 breast cancer patients were concomitantly evaluated by routine cytology and FISH, using centromere-specific probes representing chromosomes 7, 11, 12, 17 and 18. After setting stringent cut-off levels deduced from non-malignant control effusions (n=9), the rates of cells with true aneuploidy were determined in each effusion sample from breast cancer patients. The occurrence of aneuploid cells, as detected by FISH and indicative of malignancy, was correlated with the cytological findings. Routine cytology revealed malignancy in 60% of effusions. Using FISH, aneuploid cell populations could be observed in 94% of cytologically positive and in 48% of cytologically negative effusions, thus reverting diagnosis to malignancy. To confirm malignancy in cases with a low frequency of aneuploid cells, two-colour FISH was additionally performed and indeed showed heterogeneous chromosomal aneuploidy within single nuclei. We conclude that FISH is a valuable tool in the diagnosis of malignancy and may serve as an adjunct to routine cytological examination, as demonstrated here for breast cancer effusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.