ArticleBiophysical journal1997
Quantification of DNA patchiness using long-range correlation measures.
Article in Biophysical journal, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Compositional Structure of the Genome: A Review.Biology · 2023Review
- Attractor metabolic networks.PloS one · 2013Article
- Effects of coarse-graining on the scaling behavior of long-range correlated and anti-correlated signals.Physica A · 2011Article
- Quantitative analysis of cellular metabolic dissipative, self-organized structures.International journal of molecular sciences · 2010Review
- Global self-regulation of the cellular metabolic structure.PloS one · 2010Article
- Article
- Phylogenetic distribution of large-scale genome patchiness.BMC evolutionary biology · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We introduce and develop new techniques to quantify DNA patchiness, and to quantify characteristics of its mosaic structure. These techniques, which involve calculating two functions, alpha(l) and beta(l), measure correlations at length scale l and detect distinct characteristic patch sizes embedded in scale-invariant patch size distributions. Using these new methods, we address a number of issues relating to the mosaic structure of genomic DNA. We find several distinct characteristic patch sizes in certain genomic sequences, and compare, contrast, and quantify the correlation properties of different sequences, including a number of yeast, human, and prokaryotic sequences. We exclude the possibility that the correlation properties and the known mosaic structure of DNA can be explained either by simple Markov processes or by tandem repeats of dinucleotides. We find that the distinct patch sizes in all 16 yeast chromosomes are similar. Furthermore, we test the hypothesis that, for yeast, patchiness is caused by the alternation of coding and noncoding regions, and the hypothesis that in human sequences patchiness is related to repetitive sequences. We find that, by themselves, neither the alternation of coding and noncoding regions, nor repetitive sequences, can fully explain the long-range correlation properties of DNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.