Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9016871›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental medicine1997

The efficiency of CD4 recruitment to ligand-engaged TCR controls the agonist/partial agonist properties of peptide-MHC molecule ligands.

J Madrenas, L A Chau, J Smith, J A Bluestone, R N Germain

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental medicine, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 178 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Dual Role of CD4 in Peripheral T Lymphocytes.Frontiers in immunology · 2019
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Suboptimal T-cell receptor signaling compromises protein translation, ribosome biogenesis, and proliferation of mouse CD8 T cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Phenotypic models of T cell activation.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2014
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. CD8 controls T cell cross-reactivity.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2010
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

J MadrenasDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
L A Chau
J Smith
J A Bluestone
R N Germain
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USWestern University · CA

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN RESPIRATORY BIOLOGYT32HL007605 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Yun Fang, Gokhan M. Mutlu · 1985 to 2026
$18.1M
THE HU-SPL-SCID MOUSE--A MODEL FOR HUMAN ALLOGRAFTINGP01AI029531 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI BLUESTONE, JEFFREY A · 1990 to 1998
–
NHLBI NIH HHS HL 07605NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007605NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI29531
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One hypothesis seeking to explain the signaling and biological properties of T cell receptor for antigen (TCR) partial agonists and antagonists is the coreceptor density/kinetic model, which proposes that the pharmacologic behavior of a TCR ligand is largely determined by the relative rates of (a) dissociation ofligand from an engaged TCR and (b) recruitment oflck-linked coreceptors to this ligand-engaged receptor. Using several approaches to prevent or reduce the association of CD4 with occupied TCR, we demonstrate that consistent with this hypothesis, the biological and biochemical consequence of limiting this interaction is to convert typical agonists into partial agonist stimuli. Thus, adding anti-CD4 antibody to T cells recognizing a wild-type peptide-MHC class II ligand leads to disproportionate inhibition of interleukin-2 (IL-2) relative to IL-3 production, the same pattern seen using a TCR partial agonist/antagonist. In addition, T cells exposed to wild-type ligand in the presence of anti-CD4 antibodies show a pattern of TCR signaling resembling that seen using partial agonists, with predominant accumulation of the p21 tyrosine-phosphorylated form of TCR-zeta, reduced tyrosine phosphorylation of CD3epsilon, and no detectable phosphorylation of ZAP-70. Similar results are obtained when the wild-type ligand is presented by mutant class II MHC molecules unable to bind CD4. Likewise, antibody coligation of CD3 and CD4 results in an agonist-like phosphorylation pattern, whereas bivalent engagement of CD3 alone gives a partial agonist-like pattern. Finally, in accord with data showing that partial agonists often induce T cell anergy, CD4 blockade during antigen exposure renders cloned T cells unable to produce IL-2 upon restimulation. These results demonstrate that the biochemical and functional responses to variant TCR ligands with partial agonist properties can be largely reproduced by inhibiting recruitment of CD4 to a TCR binding a wild-type ligand, consistent with the idea that the relative rates of TCR-ligand disengagement and of association of engaged TCR with CD4 may play a key role in determining the pharmacologic properties of peptide-MHC molecule ligands. Beyond this insight into signaling through the TCR, these results have implications for models of thymocyte selection and the use of anti-coreceptor antibodies in vivo for the establishment ofimmunological tolerance.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsCell LineMajor Histocompatibility ComplexMiceMolecular Sequence DataPeptidesPhosphorylationReceptors, Antigen, T-CellSignal TransductionTh1 CellsPeptidesReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

PMID9016871
PMCPMC2196122
OpenAlexW2133944986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.