ArticleNucleic acids research1997
Two step synthesis of (-) strong-stop DNA by avian and murine reverse transcriptases in vitro.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Initiation of HIV Reverse Transcription.Viruses · 2010Article
- Initiation of HIV-2 reverse transcription: a secondary structure model of the RNA-tRNA(Lys3) duplex.Nucleic acids research · 2001Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retroviral reverses transcriptases (RTs) are RNA- and DNA-dependent DNA polymerases that use a tRNA bound at the so-called primer binding site (PBS) located near the 5'end of the genomic RNA as primer. Thus, RTs must be able to accommodate both RNA and DNA in the primer strand. To test whether the natural primer confers some advantages to the priming process, we compared initiation of reverse transcription of avian and murine retroviral RNAs, using either their natural tRNA primer, tRNATrp and tRNAPro, respectively, or synthetic 18mer oligodeoxyribonucleotides (ODNs) and oligoribonucleotides (ORNs) complementary to their PBS. In both retroviral systems, the initial extension of ODNs was fast and processive. The initial extension of ORNs, tRNATrp and tRNAPro was much slower and distributive, giving rise to the transient accumulation of short pausing products. Synthesis of (-) strong-stop DNA was delayed when using ORNs and tRNAs, compared to ODNs. Even though ORNs and tRNAs were initially extended at the same rate, the short pausing products were more rapidly extended when using the tRNA primers. As a consequence, synthesis of (-) strong-stop DNA was much more efficient with tRNA primers, compared to ORNs. Taken together, these results suggest that the tRNA-primed synthesis of (-) strong-stop DNA is a two-step process, as already observed for HIV-1. The initiation mode corresponds to the initial non-processive nucleotide addition and extension of the short pausing products. It is more efficient with the natural primers than with ORNs. Initiation is followed by a more processive and unspecific elongation mode. Elongation is observed when the primer strand is DNA, i.e. when using the ODNs as primers or when the ORN and tRNA primers have been extended by a sufficient number (depending on the retroviral system) of deoxyribonucleotides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.