Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9014827›Full record

ArticleImmunology1996

Differential expression and function of CD80 (B7-1) and CD86 (B7-2) on human peripheral blood monocytes.

J Fleischer, E Soeth, N Reiling, E Grage-Griebenow, H D Flad, M Ernst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immunology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Xenorecognition and costimulation of porcine endothelium-derived extracellular vesicles in initiating human porcine-specific T cell immune responses.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Infection and immunity · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J FleischerForschungszentrum Borstel, Department of Immunology and Cell Biology, Germany.
E Soeth
N Reiling
E Grage-Griebenow
H D Flad
M Ernst
Research Center Borstel - Leibniz Lung Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interaction of CD28 with its ligands is important for T-cell activation. Recent studies demonstrated the existence of at least two ligands on accessory cells, CD80 (B7-1) and CD86 (B7-2). In this study we demonstrate that, although CD80 and CD86 are both expressed on monocytes, they seem to have different functions. Freshly isolated monocytes express CD86 but are CD80-negative. CD80 expression is weakly induced after 6-8 hr of in vitro culture and is enhanced by stimulation. CD86 expression is enhanced faster than CD80 expression and reaches the peak level after 4-6 hr in stimulated cells. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction studies demonstrate that freshly isolated monocytes contain no CD80-mRNA. The mRNA of CD80 is induced after 4-6 hr of culture, which matches with the expression of the protein. Inhibition studies using different antibodies against both molecules and the fusion protein CTLA4Ig show that only anti-CD80 and CTLA4Ig could partially inhibit antigen-specific (tuberculin) and polyclonal (anti-CD3) lymphoproliferation and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) secretion of T cells cocultured with autologous monocytes. IFN-gamma secretion was more sensitive to blocking costimulation than proliferation. The antibody BB-1 did not inhibit proliferation and cytokine secretion, nor did the anti-CD86 clone IT2.2. CTLA4Ig, which binds both CD80 and CD86, has the same inhibitory capacity as the anti-CD80 antibody tested. From those findings we conclude that human monocytes use CD80 as a costimulatory ligand for CD28 and utilize other costimulatory mechanisms besides those mediated via molecules of the B7 family.

Indexed as

Antigens, CDB7-1 AntigenB7-2 AntigenCD3 ComplexCells, CulturedHumansInterferon-gammaLymphocyte ActivationMembrane GlycoproteinsMonocytesPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, MessengerT-LymphocytesTuberculinAntigens, CDB7-1 AntigenB7-2 AntigenCD3 ComplexCD86 protein, humanInterferon-gammaMembrane GlycoproteinsRNA, MessengerTuberculin

Identifiers

PMID9014827
PMCPMC1456589
OpenAlexW2078843264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.