Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9012555›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics1997

Principles of drug administration in renal insufficiency.

Y W Lam, S Banerji, C Hatfield, R L Talbert

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 159 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Nanotherapeutics in Kidney Disease: Innovations, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pharmacokinetics in children with chronic kidney disease.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Y W LamCollege of Pharmacy, University of Texas at Austin, USA.
S Banerji
C Hatfield
R L Talbert
The University of Texas at Austin · USAustin College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Normal renal function is important for the excretion and metabolism of many drugs. Renal diseases which affect glomerular blood flow and filtration, tubular secretion, reabsorption and renal parenchymal mass alter drug clearances and lead to the need for alterations in dosage regimens to optimise therapeutic outcome and minimise the risk of toxicity. Renal disease is increasing and the cost of care has risen progressively over the past decade. Part of these costs is related to inappropriate drug therapy and excessive drug use. Although there are a variety of methods for evaluating the various aspects of renal function, the most practical and commonly used clinical measure of renal function is estimated creatinine clearance (CLCR) as a marker for glomerular filtration. This is useful since alterations in drug clearance are proportional to alterations in CLCR, and this relationship is used as the basis for changing doses and dosage intervals for drugs which are largely renally excreted. Two populations, neonates and the elderly, are at risk of inappropriate drug dosage due to physiological changes in renal function. Estimated CLCR may not be the best method of evaluating renal function in these patients, and dosage regimens should be carefully considered. Renal insufficiency and concurrent drug therapy used in these populations can either increase or decrease drug absorption, depending on the particular agent. Drug distribution may be altered in renal insufficiency due to pH-dependent protein binding and reduced protein (primarily albumin) levels. Interestingly, renal disease may affect hepatic as well as renal drug metabolism; the exact mechanisms for these changes are not well understood. The most important quantitative pharmacokinetic change is excretion. Glomerular filtration and tubular process may both be affected but not to the same extent, and the type of renal disease may differentially affect filtration and excretion. Drug removal by dialysis is dependent on a number of factors, including the characteristics of a particular drug and the type of dialysis and equipment used. Therapeutic outcomes may be evaluated using end-points such as plasma concentrations, patient outcomes such as reduction in fever or negative cultures, and system-wide changes such as drug-use or laboratory-use patterns.

Indexed as

PharmacokineticsHumansKidneyPharmaceutical PreparationsRenal InsufficiencyRenal Replacement TherapyUnited StatesPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID9012555
OpenAlexW2089362348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.