ReviewDrug safety1997
A risk-benefit assessment of corticosteroids in the management of croup.
Review in Drug safety, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Low-dose (0.15 mg/kg) versus high-dose (0.6 mg/kg) dexamethasone for pediatric croup: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of RCTs.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Trends in Incidence and Drug Prescriptions for Croup in Children Under 5 Years of Age: A 2002-2019 Population-Based Study.Journal of Korean medical science · 2024Article
- Do steroids prevent reintubation in children with laryngotracheobronchitis?Critical care (London, England) · 2000Article
- Autocrine regulation and experimental modulation of interleukin-6 expression by human pulmonary epithelial cells infected with respiratory syncytial virus.Journal of virology · 1998Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Croup is an acute clinical syndrome of childhood characterised by a barking cough, hoarse voice, stridor and a variable degree of respiratory distress. A meta-analysis and subsequent controlled trials clearly demonstrate that corticosteroids are efficacious in the management of croup, with their benefits conclusively outweighing their risks. In mild to moderate cases of croup either systemic or nebulised corticosteroids decrease symptoms and need for hospitalisation. Most reports use IM dexamethasone 0.6 mg/kg, although it is likely that dexamethasone 0.15 mg/kg has a similar effect. In controlled studies nebulised budesonide 2 mg is superior to placebo, and appears to have equivalent efficacy to oral dexamethasone. The risk of a single or short course of systemic corticosteroids are minimal, the only potential significant adverse effect being increased risk of severe varicella infection. Short courses of nebulised budesonide have no major adverse effects, and thus are likely to cause fewer adverse effects than systemic corticosteroids, although this is as yet unproven. On the body of data published to date, either oral dexamethasone 0.15 mg/kg or nebulised budesonide 2 mg are effective for mild to moderate croup. In severe croup requiring intubation, oral prednisolone 1 mg/kg every 12 hours decreases the duration of intubation and the need for re intubation. Unless there are clear contraindications, corticosteroids are the treatment of choice in mild, moderate and severe croup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.