ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis1997
Effects of ionizing radiation on the adhesive interaction of human tumor and endothelial cells in vitro.
Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiobiological Studies of Microvascular Damage through In Vitro Models: A Methodological Perspective.Cancers · 2021Review
- Effect of Ionizing Radiation on Human EA.hy926 Endothelial Cells under Inflammatory Conditions and Their Interactions with A549 Tumour Cells.Journal of immunology research · 2019Article
- Enhanced tumor cell isolation by a biomimetic combination of E-selectin and anti-EpCAM: implications for the effective separation of circulating tumor cells (CTCs).Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A centrifugation assay was used to determine the effects of ionizing radiation on the adhesive interaction of A549 human lung adenocarcinoma tumor cells and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC). The tumor cells were fluorescently labeled and divided into control (sham-irradiated) and irradiated groups. The irradiated groups were exposed to irradiation levels ranging from 5 to 20 Gy using a 137Cs source. A specified number of these A549 tumor cells were then delivered into each well of 96-well cell culture plates containing confluent monolayers of human umbilical cord vein endothelial cells (HUVEC), and were given time to adhere to the endothelial cells. The wells were then sealed and were exposed to an acceleration field varying from 1 to 42 g (0-500 rpm) for 10 min. Finally, the wells were drained, and the number of tumor cells adhering to the endothelial monolayer were counted using a fluorescent microscope system. Our results indicate that the irradiation of A549 tumor cells significantly increased their adhesive interaction with endothelial cells (number of adhering irradiated cells/number of adhering control cells = 1.0, 1.3, 1.9, 2.2 for 0, 5, 10, 20 Gy respectively). In contrast, when endothelial cells were irradiated, rather than tumor cells, adhesive interaction decreased with an increase in the radiation dose (irradiated/control = 1.0, 0.9, 0. 8, 0.5 for 0, 5, 10, 20 Gy respectively). Simultaneous irradiation of both the tumor cells and the endothelial cells did not alter their adhesive interaction significantly. These findings may have important implications for the metastatic ability of irradiated tumor cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9009101What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.