ArticleThe American journal of pathology1997
Prognostic significance of the proliferative activity in neuroblastoma.
Article in The American journal of pathology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A machine learning algorithm for simulating immunohistochemistry: development of SOX10 virtual IHC and evaluation on primarily melanocytic neoplasms.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2020Article
- Prognostic value of the International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification in Neuroblastoma (Schwannian stroma-poor) and comparison with other prognostic factors: a study of 182 cases from the Spanish Neuroblastoma Registry.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2006Article
- Regulation of telomerase activity by alternate splicing of human telomerase reverse transcriptase mRNA in a subset of neuroblastomas.The American journal of pathology · 2001Article
- Prognostic relevance of a novel proliferation marker, Ki-S11, for soft-tissue sarcoma. A multivariate study.The American journal of pathology · 1997Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prognostic significance of the immunohistochemically assessed growth fraction in neuroblastomas was determined in relation to tumor grade and tumor stage. A total of 101 cases of neuroblastoma were examined with the monoclonal antibodies PC10 against proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and Ki-S5 against the Ki-67 protein. Patients were followed for a mean time of 4.8 years. Expression of both PC10 and Ki-S5 was found to be significantly linked to tumor grade and tumor stage. Prognostically favorable stage IVs was associated with low PCNA and Ki-S5 levels. For ganglioneuroblastoma, significant differences were found between the diffuse and the composite type. In univariate analysis of stage III and IV tumors, Ki-S5 and PCNA scores were significantly correlated with disease-free survival (P < 0.0015), allowing definition of a subset of cases with favorable outcome. As to Shimada's group with poor prognosis, significant differences in the clinical course were found for low and high Ki-S5 scores (P = 0.036) but not for PCNA. In multivariate analysis, only patient age, Shimada's grade, and Ki-S5 scores achieved prognostic significance. We conclude that proliferation marker Ki-S5 may provide substantial prognostic information and might become a useful adjunct for predicting the clinical courses of neuroblastoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9006330PMC1858526What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.