Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8986814›Full record

Trial reportProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1996

Results of MDR-1 vector modification trial indicate that granulocyte/macrophage colony-forming unit cells do not contribute to posttransplant hematopoietic recovery following intensive systemic therapy.

E G Hanania, R E Giles, J Kavanagh, S Q Fu, D Ellerson, Z Zu, T Wang, Y Su, A Kudelka, Z Rahman and 15 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 152 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Is cancer gene therapy an empty suit?The Lancet. Oncology · 2013
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Gene therapy with drug resistance genes.Cancer gene therapy · 2006
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy.International journal of hematology · 2002
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Clinical gene therapy in hematology: past and future.International journal of hematology · 2001
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

E G HananiaUniversity of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030, USA.
R E Giles
J Kavanagh
S Q Fu
D Ellerson
Z Zu
T Wang
Y Su
A Kudelka
Z Rahman
F Holmes
G Hortobagyi
D Claxton
C Bachier
P Thall
S Cheng
J Hester
J M Ostrove
R E Bird
A Chang
M Korbling
D Seong
R Cote
T Holzmayer
A B Deisseroth
Clinical Research Associates · USYale University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

TOLERANCE INDUCTION BY MEGADOSE STEM CELL TRANSPLANTS IN CML--GVHD AND GVLP01CA049639 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI THALL, PETER F · 1990 to 2014
$41.8M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA049639NCI NIH HHS P01 CA49639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To formally test the hypothesis that the granulocyte/macrophage colony-forming unit (GM-CFU) cells can contribute to early hematopoietic reconstitution immediately after transplant, the frequency of genetically modified GM-CFU after retroviral vector transduction was measured by a quantitative in situ polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which is specific for the multidrug resistance-1 (MDR-1) vector, and by a quantitative GM-CFU methylcellulose plating assay. The results of this analysis showed no difference between the transduction frequency in the products of two different transduction protocols: "suspension transduction" and "stromal growth factor transduction." However, when an analysis of the frequency of cells positive for the retroviral MDR-1 vector posttransplantation was carried out, 0 of 10 patients transplanted with cells transduced by the suspension method were positive for the vector MDR-1 posttransplant, whereas 5 of 8 patients transplanted with the cells transduced by the stromal growth factor method were positive for the MDR-1 vector transcription unit by in situ or in solution PCR assay (a difference that is significant at the P = 0.0065 level by the Fisher exact test). These data suggest that only very small subsets of the GM-CFU fraction of myeloid cells, if any, contribute to the repopulation of the hematopoietic tissues that occurs following intensive systemic therapy and transplantation of autologous hematopoietic cells.

Indexed as

Bone Marrow TransplantationGenetic TherapyHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1Base SequenceBone MarrowBreast NeoplasmsColony-Forming Units AssayCyclophosphamideDNA PrimersEtoposideFemaleHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansOvarian NeoplasmsATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1CyclophosphamideDNA PrimersEtoposide

Identifiers

PMID8986814
PMCPMC26407
OpenAlexW2122062489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.