Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8982942›Full record

ReviewJournal of inherited metabolic disease1996

Review: preimplantation diagnosis of inherited disease.

W Lissens, K Sermon, C Staessen, E V Assche, C Janssenswillen, H Joris, A Van Steirteghem, I Liebaers

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W LissensCentre for Medical Genetics, University Hospital of the Dutch-speaking Brussels Free University (Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.
K Sermon
C Staessen
E V Assche
C Janssenswillen
H Joris
A Van Steirteghem
I Liebaers
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preimplantation diagnosis of inherited diseases has become possible with the techniques of in vitro fertilization, blastomere biopsy of the 6- to 10-cell embryo and DNA analysis of the single blastomeres. Disease-free embryos are selected for transfer to the uterus, thereby avoiding the need for termination of a fetus diagnosed as affected in prenatal diagnosis in the first or early-second trimester of pregnancy. The genetic indications for preimplantation diagnosis are theoretically the same as for prenatal diagnosis, but the defects must be detectable by the polymerase chain reaction. For X-linked recessive diseases, fluorescence in situ hybridization can be used as an alternative for the selection of female embryos. So far almost 40 healthy children have been born worldwide after preimplantation diagnosis for genetic disease. The possibilities and limitations of preimplantation diagnosis, especially in prevention of inherited disease, are discussed in this review.

Indexed as

Fertilization in VitroPrenatal DiagnosisAllelesBlastomeresDNAFemaleGenetic LinkageHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionPregnancyX ChromosomeDNA

Identifiers

PMID8982942
OpenAlexW2047317150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.