ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1996
Temporal differences between the involvement of angiotensin II and endothelin in the cardiovascular responses to endotoxaemia in conscious rats.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of protease-activated receptor 2 in regulation of renin synthesis and secretion in mice.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2019Article
- Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system affects kidney tissue oxygenation evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with chronic kidney disease.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2014Article
- The angiotensin II AT1 receptor-associated protein Arap1 is involved in sepsis-induced hypotension.Critical care (London, England) · 2013Article
- The neural and vascular effects of killed Su-Streptococcus pyogenes (OK-432) in preterm fetal sheep.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2010Article
- Angiotensin II in experimental hyperdynamic sepsis.Critical care (London, England) · 2009Article
- Bolus injection of human UII in conscious rats evokes a biphasic haemodynamic response.British journal of pharmacology · 2004Article
- Selective versus non-selective suppression of nitric oxide synthase on regional hemodynamics in rats with or without LPS-induced endotoxemia.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2003Article
- Effects of the novel selective endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist, SB 234551, on the cardiovascular responses to endotoxaemia in conscious rats.British journal of pharmacology · 2001Article
- Regional haemodynamic responses to infusion of lipopolysaccharide in conscious rats: effects of pre- or post-treatment with glibenclamide.British journal of pharmacology · 1999Article
- Influence of CGRP (8-37), but not adrenomedullin (22-52), on the haemodynamic responses to lipopolysaccharide in conscious rats.British journal of pharmacology · 1999Article
- Monitoring haemodynamic changes in rodent models to better inform safety pharmacology: Novel insights fromJRSM cardiovascular diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. Male, Long Evans rats were instrumented chronically with pulsed Doppler probes and intravascular catheters to allow assessment of regional haemodynamic changes during i.v. infusion of lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 150 micrograms kg-1 h-1). 2. In the presence of the AT1-receptor antagonists, losartan (10 mg kg-1 + 10 kg-1 h-1), the initial (1-2 h) hypotensive and renal, mesenteric and hindquarters vasodilator responses to LPS were enhanced significantly. Thereafter these effects waned, but between 8-23 h after the onset of LPS infusion, a further fall in mean atrial blood pressure (MAP) and increases in renal and hindquarters flows and conductances occurred. All these changes were significantly greater than seen with losartan or LPS alone, and exceeded the sum of their effects. 3. In the presence of captopril (2 mg kg-1 + 2 mg kg-1 h-1), the initial hypotensive and renal vasodilator responses to LPS were enhanced, but less so than in the presence of losartan. However, the effects of LPS in the presence of losartan and captopril together were not different from those in the presence of losartan alone. These observations indicate that the ability of captopril to inhibit the degradation of bradykinin had no additional influence, and the differences between the effect of captopril and losartan on the initial effects of LPS were probably due to more effective suppression of the action of angiotensin II by losartan. 4. In the absence of LPS, co-infusion of losartan and the non-selective endothelin antagonist, SB 209670 (600 micrograms kg-1 + 600 micrograms kg-1 h-1), caused a substantial, progressive hypotension (-25 +/- 2 mmHg at 24 h) accompanied by increases in renal, mesenteric and hindquarters vascular conductances (31 +/- 13, 44 +/- 9 and 45 +/- 12%, respectively), indicating an involvement of angiotensin II and endothelin in the maintenance of normal cardiovascular status in conscious, Long Evans rats. 5. In the presence of losartan and SB 209670, the initial, LPS-induced fall in MAP (-42 +/- 2 mmHg) was not different from that in the presence of losartan (-39 +/- 4 mmHg), and the increases in renal, in mesenteric, and in hindquarters vascular conductances were similar in the two conditions. However, there was no recovery in MAP, and there were persistent renal, mesenteric and hindquarter vasodilatations. 6. In all experiments involving LPS, administration of the V1- receptor antagonist, d(CH2)5-O-Me-Tyr-AVP (10 micrograms kg-1), 23 h after the start of LPS infusion caused additional hypotension and mesenteric vasodilatation, particularly. This effect was most marked in animals pretreated with losartan and SB 209670. 7. The results indicate that the initial (1-2 h) depressor and dilator effects of LPS infusion in conscious Long Evans rats are opposed by the actions of angiotensins II, rather than endothelin. However, between 2-8 h after the onset of LPS infusion the involvement of endothelin develops and that of angiotensin II fades. By 24 h after the start of infusion of LPS, the pressor and vasoconstrictor actions of endothelin wane, and a role of vasopressin is apparent. At no stage is there clear evidence for an involvement of bradykinin in the haemodynamic sequelae of endotoxaemia in this model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.