Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8980394›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer1996

Multicentre phase II pharmacological evaluation of rhizoxin. Eortc early clinical studies (ECSG)/pharmacology and molecular mechanisms (PAMM) groups.

H L McLeod, L S Murray, J Wanders, A Setanoians, M A Graham, N Pavlidis, B Heinrich, W W ten Bokkel Huinink, D J Wagener, S Aamdal and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Journal of natural products · 2019
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Toward a Cancer Drug of Fungal Origin.Medicinal research reviews · 2015
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

H L McLeodDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Glasgow, UK.
L S Murray
J Wanders
A Setanoians
M A Graham
N Pavlidis
B Heinrich
W W ten Bokkel Huinink
D J Wagener
S Aamdal
J Verweij
University of Glasgow · GBErasmus University Rotterdam · NLLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DERadboud University Nijmegen · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity of Ioannina · GRVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhizoxin is a macrocyclic lactone compound that binds to tubulin and inhibits microtubule assembly. Rhizoxin demonstrated preclinical anti-tumour activity against a variety of human tumour cell lines and xenograft models. Phase I evaluation found a maximum tolerated rhizoxin dose of 2.6 mg m-2, with reversible, but dose-limiting, mucositis, leucopenia and diarrhoea. Clinical trials were then initiated by the EORTC ECSG in melanoma, breast, head and neck, and non-small-cell lung cancers with the recommended phase II rhizoxin dose of 2 mg m-2. Pharmacological studies were instituted with the phase II trials to complement the limited pharmacokinetic data available from the phase I trial. Blood samples were obtained from 69 of 103 eligible patients enrolled in phase II rhizoxin studies, and these were evaluable for pharmacokinetic analysis in 36 patients. Plasma rhizoxin concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and post-distribution pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by a one-compartment model. Rhizoxin was rapidly eliminated from plasma, with a median systemic clearance of 8.41 min-1 m-2 and an elimination half-life of 10.4 min. Rhizoxin area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was higher in patients obtaining a partial response or stable disease than in those with progressive disease (median 314 vs 222 ng ml-1 min; P = 0.03). As predicted from previous studies, haematological and gastrointestinal toxicity was observed, but could not be shown to be related to rhizoxin AUC. This study demonstrated the rapid and variable elimination of rhizoxin from the systemic circulation. The presence of pharmacodynamic relationships and the low level of systemic toxicity suggest that future trials of rhizoxin with alternative dosage or treatment schedules are warranted.

Indexed as

Antibiotics, AntineoplasticArea Under CurveBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansInjections, IntravenousLactonesLung NeoplasmsMacrolidesMaleMelanomaTreatment OutcomeAntibiotics, AntineoplasticLactonesMacrolidesrhizoxin

Identifiers

PMID8980394
PMCPMC2074819
OpenAlexW2047552592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.