Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8976063›Full record

ArticleGenetica1996

Clusters of identical new mutation in the evolutionary landscape.

R C Woodruff, H Huai, J N Thompson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetica, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Highly variable recessive lethal or nearly lethal mutation rates during germ-line development of male Drosophila melanogaster.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Spontaneous occurrence of a Robertsonian fusion involving chromosome 19 by single whole-arm reciprocal translocation (WART) in wild-derived house mice.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2000
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

R C WoodruffDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bowling Green State University, OH 43403, USA.
H Huai
J N Thompson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In contrast to the common assumption that each new mutant results from a unique, independent mutation event, clusters of identical premeiotic mutant alleles are common. Clusters can produce large numbers of related individuals carrying identical copies of the same new genetic change. By entering the gene pool in multiple copies at one time, clusters can influence fundamental processes of population genetics. Here we report evidence that clusters can increase the arrival and fixation probabilities and can lengthen the average time to extinction of new mutations. We also suggest it may be necessary to reconsider other fundamental elements of population genetic theory.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingGenes, LethalGenes, RecessiveModels, GeneticAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterFemaleGene FrequencyMaleMathematicsSex Characteristics

Identifiers

PMID8976063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.