Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8969242›Full record

ReviewEmerging infectious diseases

Guarding against the most dangerous emerging pathogens.

P W Ewald

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Emerging infectious diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The uneasy coexistence of predators and pathogens.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2020
    Article
  2. EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES - OVERVIEW.Disease-a-month : DM · 2018
    Review
  3. Article
  4. The Homolog of the GeneInfection and immunity · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Insights from genomic comparisons of genetically monomorphic bacterial pathogens.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2012
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Pathogen survival in the external environment and the evolution of virulence.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2004
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Virulence evolution in a virus obeys a trade-off.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 1999
    Article
  15. The evolution of virulence and emerging diseases.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 1998
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

P W EwaldDepartment of Biology, Amherst College, Amherst, MA 01002-5000, USA. pwewald@amherst.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Control of emerging infectious diseases will be difficult because of the large number of disease-causing organisms that are emerging or could emerge and the great diversity of geographic areas in which emergence can occur. The modern view of the evolution of pathogen virulence--specifically its focus on the tradeoff between costs and benefits to the pathogen from increased host exploitation--allows control programs to identify and focus on the most dangerous pathogens (those that can be established with high virulence in human populations).

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriaBiological EvolutionCommunicable DiseasesCross InfectionDisease OutbreaksDisease VectorsHumansSexually Transmitted DiseasesVirulenceVirusesWater Microbiology

Identifiers

PMID8969242
PMCPMC2639916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.