Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8968656›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics1996

Clinical pharmacokinetics of sedatives in neonates.

E Jacqz-Aigrain, P Burtin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Midazolam for sedation of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Opioid analgesia in mechanically ventilated children: results from the multicenter Measuring Opioid Tolerance Induced by Fentanyl study.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2013
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Anesthesia and analgesia in the NICU.Clinics in perinatology · 2012
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of oral midazolam in preterm infants.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2002
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E Jacqz-AigrainUnité de Pharmacologie Clinique, Hôpital Robert Debré, Paris, France.
P Burtin
Hôpital Robert-Debré · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sedation is currently administered to neonates experiencing pain and stress during intensive care for medical diseases, as well as postoperatively. Drugs commonly used for sedation in neonates include benzodiazepines (midazolam and lorazepam), chloral hydrate and opioids (fentanyl and morphine). Sedation protocols and dosage schedules are, in most cases, adapted from those which have been developed in children and even adults. The effectiveness and safety of the sedative agents remain underevaluated, however, due to the difficulties of quantifying pain and stress in neonates, and because of the limited use of validated scoring methods by practitioners. Among the benzodiazepines, midazolam is probably the drug of choice for continuous sedation. However, its elimination is delayed in the neonatal period and hypotension may occur when given as a bolus injection or when taken with opioids. Lorazepam requires further evaluation to exclude severe neurotoxicity. Chloral hydrate is administered orally, but because of its delayed elimination and risk of accumulation, a single administration for short term sedation is recommended. Among opioids, fentanyl (which was initially administered for postoperative analgesia) is now prescribed for sedation during mechanical ventilation. Tolerance and dependence may develop rapidly, limiting its usefulness for prolonged sedation. Although extensively studied in neonates, the efficacy and safety of morphine are not clearly determined, because of the limited number of patients included in individual studies. In addition, important interindividual differences in metabolism render dosage recommendations difficult. Alfentanil and sufentanil need further investigations to define their pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic properties in neonates. Although the choice of drug is important, the way the drug is used and monitored is equally important. All the drugs used for the sedation of neonates have large inter- and intraindividual differences in disposition, justifying specific pharmacological knowledge and individual dosage adjustments based on clinical evaluation of the patient and the monitoring of drug concentrations.

Indexed as

HumansHypnotics and SedativesInfant, NewbornPainStress, PhysiologicalHypnotics and Sedatives

Identifiers

PMID8968656
OpenAlexW2070270623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.