ArticleBiophysical journal1996
Electrostatics and electrodynamics of bacteriorhodopsin.
Article in Biophysical journal, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modulation of aggregation with an electric field; scientific roadmap for a potential non-invasive therapy against tauopathies.RSC advances · 2019Article
- Using DelPhi capabilities to mimic protein's conformational reorganization with amino acid specific dielectric constants.Communications in computational physics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The stationary electric dichroism of bacteriorhodopsin is in qualitative, but not quantitative, agreement with the orientation function for disks having a permanent dipole directed perpendicular to the plane and an induced dipole in the plane. Fits of the orientation function to data measured at low field strengths demonstrate: an increase of the permanent dipole moment mu with the square of the disk radius r2, whereas the polarizability alpha increases with r4; the ionic strength dependence is small for mu and clearly stronger for alpha; the permanent dipole moment is 4x10(6) D at r = 0.5 micron. According to the risetime constants, the induced dipole does not saturate and increases to 4x10(8) D at 40 kV/cm and r = 0.5 micron. The data indicate that the permanent dipole is not of some interfacial character but is due to a real assymetry of the charge distribution. The experimental dipole moment per protein monomer is approximately 55 D, whereas calculations based on the structure of Grigorieff et al. (Grigorieff, N., T.A. Ceska, K.H. Downing, J.M. Baldwin, and R. Henderson. 1996. Electron-crystallographic refinement of the structure of bacteriorhodopsin. J. Mol. Biol. 259:393-421) provide a dipole moment of approximately 570 D. The difference is probably due to a nonsymmetric distribution of charged lipid residues. It is concluded that experimental dipole moments reflect the mu-potential at the plane of shear for rotational diffusion, in analogy to the sigma-potential used for translational diffusion. It is suggested that the permanent dipole of bacteriorhodopsin supports proton transport by attraction of protons inside and repulsion of protons outside of the cell. Dichroism rise curves at field strengths between E = 150 and 800 V/cm reveal an exponential component with time constants tau 3r in the range between 1 and 40 ms, which is not found in Brownian dynamics simulations on a disk structure using hydrodynamic and electric parameters characteristic of bacteriorhodopsin disks. The experimental data suggest that this process reflects a cooperative change of the bacteriorhodopsin structure, which is induced already at a remarkably low field strength of approximately 150 V/cm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.