Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8968577›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal1996

Analytical steady-state solution to the rapid buffering approximation near an open Ca2+ channel.

G D Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cross Talking Calcium, IPCell biochemistry and biophysics · 2024
    Article
  6. Model of Calcium Dynamics RegulatingActa biotheoretica · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. CaPhysiological reviews · 2024
    Review
  9. Impact of Interdependent CaCell biochemistry and biophysics · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Mechanistic insights of neuronal calcium and IPEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Stationary CaBiophysical journal · 2021
    Article
  19. Mathematical Modeling of Calcium Oscillatory Patterns in a Neuron.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

G D SmithInstitute of Theoretical Dynamics, University of California, Davis 95616, USA.

Funding

MODELING CALCIUM WAVES IN MATURE XENOPUS LAEVIS OOCYTESR01RR010081 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI HEDRICK, JERRY L · 1996 to 2000
$193k
NCRR NIH HHS R01 RR 10081-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We derive an analytical steady-state solution for the Ca2+ profile near an open Ca2+ channel based on a transport equation which describes the buffered diffusion of Ca2+ in the presence of rapid stationary and mobile Ca2+ buffers (Wagner and Keizer, 1994). This steady-state rapid buffering approximation gives an upper bound on local Ca2+ elevations such as Ca2+ puffs or sparks when conditions for the validity of the rapid buffering approximation are met and is an alternative to approximations that assume that mobile buffers are unsaturable. This result also provides an analytical estimate of the cytosolic Ca2+ domain concentration ([Ca2+]d) near a channel pore and shows the dependence of [Ca2+]d on moderate concentrations of endogenous mobile buffer, Ca2+ indicator dye, and bulk cytosolic Ca2+. Assuming a simple relationship between [Ca2+]d and the lumenal depletion domain of an intracellular Ca2+ channel, lumenal and cytosolic Ca2+ profiles are matched to give an implicit analytical expression for the effect of bulk lumenal Ca2+ on [Ca2+]d.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalAnimalsBuffersCalciumCalcium ChannelsCytosolIon Channel GatingKineticsBuffersCalciumCalcium Channels

Identifiers

PMID8968577
PMCPMC1233795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.