ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1996
Discrimination between neuropeptide Y and peptide YY in the rat tail artery by the neuropeptide Y1-selective antagonist, BIBP 3226.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heterogeneity of the neuropeptide Y (NPY) contractile and relaxing receptors in horse penile small arteries.British journal of pharmacology · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. The ability of the novel, nonpeptide, neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y1-selective antagonist, BIBP 3226 ¿(R)-N2-(diphenylacetyl)-N-[(4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl]-D-arginine amide¿, to antagonize the increase in perfusion pressure induced by NPY and peptide Y (PYY) was tested in the perfused rat tail artery, a postjunctional Y1-receptor bioassay, precontracted by 1 microM phenylephrine. 2. NPY and PYY produced a concentration-dependent enhancement of the vasoconstrictor response evoked by 1 microM phenylephrine. Although NPY and PYY are roughly equipotent, the maximal contractile response elicited by PYY was about twice that elicited by NPY. 3. Increasing concentrations of BIBP 3226 caused a parallel and rightward shift in the NPY concentration-response curve without depressing the maximal response. The contractile effect of NPY was potently inhibited in a competitive manner. The pA2 value for BIBP 3226 was 7.01 +/- 0.08, a value equivalent to that observed in the rabbit saphenous vein. Although increasing concentrations of BIBP 3226 shifted the concentration-response curve of PYY to the right without any significant decrease in the maximal vasoconstrictor response, the antagonism appeared non-competitive as the slope of the Schild plot was significantly different from unity (0.58 +/- 0.04). 4. In conclusion, these data confirm that BIBP 3226 is a potent and selective nonpeptide Y1 receptor antagonist. Moreover, they show that complex interactions occur between BIBP 3226 and postjunctional receptors activated by PYY. We postulate that BIBP 3226 might discriminate between the effects of NPY and PYY at the postjunctional level in the rat tail artery. It may be that distinct receptors for NPY and PYY exist; these may or may not allosterically interact with each other. Another working hypothesis would be that there is a single receptor complex with allosterically interacting binding sites for the two peptides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.