ArticleActa neurochirurgica1976
On the nature of brain stem disorders in severe head injured patients. II. A study on caloric vestibular reactions and neurotransmitter treatment.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 1976. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Therapies to Restore Consciousness in Patients with Severe Brain Injuries: A Gap Analysis and Future Directions.Neurocritical care · 2021Article
- Assessment of brainstem damage by the auditory brainstem response in acute severe head injury.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 1980Article
Corrections and comments
- AssociatedPublication
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The results of electro-oculographic recordings made after caloric vestibular stimulation (C.O.G.) in severe head injured patients are discussed. It was found that: 1. The C.O.G. correlates with the state of consciousness of the patients. 2. The rate of improvement of the C.O.G. correlates with the rate of the clinical improvement. 3. A prediction of the duration of unconsciousness can be made by repeated C.O.G. scores as well as by repeated scoring of the clinical state. 4. In all patients a paradoxical response is present except in those who have regained clear consciousness and in those persisting in a vegetative state, so the presence of a paradoxical response indicates the possibility of further improvement. It was supposed that in patients with a paradoxical response a functional brain dysfunction was present, which was at least partly caused by disturbed neurotransmitter metabolism. Therapeutic trials with L-DOPA and physostigmine were successful in patients with a paradoxical response, but without any result in those without this phenomenon. The responses to L-DOPA and to physostigmine are related respectively to motor pattern and to verbal or non-verbal communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
8960What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.