Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8956706›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1996

Prevalence of potentially inappropriate long term prescribing in general practice in the United Kingdom, 1980-95: systematic literature review.

S A Buetow, B Sibbald, J A Cantrill, S Halliwell

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Development and validation of a new Prescription Quality Index.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2010
    Article
  8. Prevalence of inappropriate prescribing in primary care.Pharmacy world & science : PWS · 2007
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Erring and learning in clinical practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Long-term prescribing of proton pump inhibitors in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1999
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Postgraduate education in clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 1998
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S A BuetowNational Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester.
B Sibbald
J A Cantrill
S Halliwell

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate long term prescribing in general practice in the United Kingdom.

designReview of 62 studies of the appropriateness of prescribing identified from seven electronic databases, from reference lists, and by hand searching of journals. A nominal group of 10 experts helped to define the appropriateness of prescribing.

settingGeneral practice in the United Kingdom.

main outcome measuresPrevalences of 19 indicators of inappropriate long term prescribing representing five dimensions: indication, choice of drug, drug administration, communication, and review.

resultsPrevalences of potentially inappropriate prescribing varied by indicator and chronic condition, but drug dosages outside the therapeutic range consistently recorded the highest rates. The lowest rates were generally associated with indicators of the choice of the drug, except cost minimisation. Communication is studied less frequently than other dimensions of prescribing appropriateness.

conclusionsThe evidence base to support allegations of widespread inappropriate prescribing in general practice is unsound. Although inappropriate prescribing has occurred, the scale of the problem is unknown because of limitations associated with selection of a standard, publication bias, and uncertainty about the context of prescribing decisions. Opportunities for cost savings and effectiveness gains are thus unclear. Indicators applicable to individual patients could yield evidence of prescribing appropriateness.

Indexed as

CommunicationDecision MakingDrug PrescriptionsDrug Utilization ReviewFamily PracticeHealth Services MisuseHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Publication BiasSensitivity and SpecificityUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID8956706
PMCPMC2352887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.