ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology1996
Electrogenic cation transport across leech caecal epithelium.
Article in Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrogenic cation transport across the caecal epithelium of the leech Hirudo medicinalis was investigated using modified Ussing chambers. Transepithelial resistance (RT) and potential difference (VT) were 61.0 +/- 3.5 omega.cm2 and -1.1 +/- 0.2 mV (n = 149), respectively, indicating that leech caecal epithelium is a "leaky" epithelium. Under control conditions short circuit current (ISC) and transepithelial Na+ transport rate (INa) averaged at 22.1 +/- 1.5 microA.cm-2 and 49.7 +/- 2.6 microA.cm-2, respectively. Mucosal application of amiloride (100 mumol.l-1) or benzamil (50 mumol.l-1) influenced neither ISC nor INa. The transport system in the apical membrane showed no pronounced cation selectivity and a linear dependence on mucosal Na+ concentration. Removal of mucosal Ca2+ increased ISC by about 50% due to an increase of transepithelial Na+ transport. Trivalent cations (La3+ and Tb3+, 1 mmol.l-1 both) added to the mucosal Ringer solution reduced INa by more than 40%. Serosal ouabain (1 mmol.l-1) almost halved ISC and INa while 0.1% (= 5.4 mmol.l-1) DNP decreased INa to 11.8 +/- 5.1% of initial values. Serosal addition of cAMP increased both ISC and INa whereas the neurotransmitters. FMRFamide, acetylcholine, GABA, L-dopa, serotonin and dopamine failed to show any effects; octopamine, glycine and L-glutamate reduced INa markedly. On the basis of these results we conclude that in leech caecal epithelium apical uptake of monovalent cations is mediated by non-selective cation conductances which are sensitive to extracellular Ca2+ but insensitive to amiloride. Basolaterally Na+ is extruded via ouabain-sensitive and -insensitive ATPases. cAMP activates Na+ transport across leech caecal epithelium, although the physiological stimulus for cAMP-production remains unknown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.