ArticleThe Journal of physiology1996
Localizing quantal currents along frog neuromuscular junctions.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Making quantal analysis more convenient, fast, and accurate: user-friendly software QUANTAN.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2008Article
- An electrically coupled network of skeletal muscle in zebrafish distributes synaptic current.The Journal of general physiology · 2006Article
- Quantal potential fields around individual active zones of amphibian motor-nerve terminals.Biophysical journal · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
1. We spatially localized the origins of quantal currents by recording simultaneously with two intracellular electrodes and employing the prediction of the one-dimensional cable equations that the time integrals of the resulting voltage changes fall off exponentially with distance. 2. Miniature endplate potentials (MEPPs) were more frequent near the centre of the endplate. In contrast to some work using other methods, we did not find MEPPs originating at the margins of the endplate to be strikingly smaller. 3. Spontaneous MEPPs and uniquantal endplate potentials (EPPs) were released over the same length of endplate and with the same relative probabilities at different regions. 4. Nicotinic agonists decreased evoked quantal output, but did not change the length over which uniquantal EPPs were generated. We conclude they do not block nerve conduction in the terminals. 5. Data sets were obtained with an extracellular electrode and two intracellular electrodes. The extracellular electrode was invariably near the centre of the region in which congruous MEPPs appeared to be generated. However, the range in the calculated positions of the synchronous MEPPs was as long as 0.8 mm. Therefore, it may be possible that extracellular electrodes have a longer recording range than commonly assumed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.