Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8951403›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research1996

Odor representation and discrimination in mitral/tufted cells of the rat olfactory bulb.

F Motokizawa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Chemotopic odorant coding in a mammalian olfactory system.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2007
    Review
  4. Sparse and selective odor coding by mitral/tufted neurons in the main olfactory bulb.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2007
    Article
  5. Sparse odor coding in awake behaving mice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2006
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Control of action potential timing by intrinsic subthreshold oscillations in olfactory bulb output neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 1999
    Article
  8. Multiple and opposing roles of cholinergic transmission in the main olfactory bulb.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 1999
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

F MotokizawaDepartment of Physiology, Nara Medical College, Kashihara, Japan.
Nara Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular single-unit responses to odorants with various properties were recorded from mitral/tufted cells over large areas of the olfactory bulb of anesthetized rats. Each cell was exposed to one stimulus set consisting of five different odorants each at five concentrations. The resulting concentration-response profiles were compared. All mitral/tufted cells examined responded to two or more odorants, and the largest proportion of the cells were sensitive to all five odorants. Cells unresponsive to all five odorants regardless of concentration were not observed. Mitral/tufted cells sensitive to all three of the odorants that are known to evoke maximal electro-olfactograms in different regions of the olfactory epithelium were distributed widely throughout the olfactory bulb. There were no significant differences in latencies of odor responses either across recording sites or across odorants. A comparison of the concentration-response profiles suggested that all of the mitral/tufted cells were equally capable of responding to any odorant with their own distinctive pattern, but that the cells tended to show an identical pattern rather than variable pattern of response to different odorants. Five mitral/tufted cells isolated within 800 microns of one electrode track showed different concentration-response profiles. Of 18 simultaneously recorded spike pairs with different amplitudes and discharge patterns recorded incidentally through one electrode at different sites, 10 had different and 8 had identical response patterns to odorants. These results suggest that: (1) mitral/tufted cells are sensitive to a broad spectrum of odorants, but respond with their own patterns to odorants; (2) odor discrimination is not uniform in neighboring cells, and a discrimination unit is comprised of a single cell.

Indexed as

OdorantsAnimalsDiscrimination, PsychologicalElectrophysiologyMaleOlfactory BulbRatsRats, WistarSmell

Identifiers

PMID8951403
OpenAlexW2023679607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.