Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8950607›Full record

ArticleHistochemistry and cell biology1996

Immunolocalization of neurophysin in cytokeratin-positive luteal cells of cows.

A M Ricken, K Spanel-Borowski

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Histochemistry and cell biology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 85% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A M RickenDepartment of Anatomy, University of Basle, Switzerland.
K Spanel-Borowski
University of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have recently detected a subgroup of cytokeratin (CK)-positive luteal cells in the bovine corpus luteum of the early and mid-luteal phase, but not in that of pregnancy. Since, according to the literature, neurophysin (NP)-positive luteal cells behave comparably, simple immunohistochemistry and double labeling were used to identify in serial sections whether the presence of NP co-incided with that of CK. The numbers of CK-positive cells and NP-positive luteal cells were comparable throughout the estrous cycle, decreasing from early to late luteal phase. While few CK-positive cells were found in the former thecal layer during the early luteal phase, many CK-positive cells appeared in the former granulosal layer. NP-positive cells were only detected in the former granulosal layer. During the mid-luteal phase, the CK-positive cells consisted of small and large luteal cells, but only large NP-positive cells were found. Roughly 80% of the large CK-positive cells contained NP, whereas CK was lacking in more than 50% of the NP-positive cells. The corpora lutea of pregnancy contained neither CK-positive nor NP-positive cells. The significance of the simultaneous occurrence of CK and NP remains to be elucidated.

Indexed as

3-Hydroxysteroid DehydrogenasesAnimalsCattleCorpus LuteumFemaleKeratinsLuteal PhaseNeurophysinsPregnancy3-Hydroxysteroid DehydrogenasesKeratinsNeurophysins

Identifiers

PMID8950607
OpenAlexW2041986506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.