ArticleThe Histochemical journal1996
The use of enhanced polymer one-step staining reagents for immunoenzyme double-labelling.
Article in The Histochemical journal, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review: immunoassays in DNA damage and instability detection.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2019Review
- Inhibition of early-phase exogenous and endogenous liver carcinogenesis in transgenic rats harboring a rat glutathione S-transferase placental form gene.Japanese journal of cancer research : Gann · 1998Article
- The EnVision++ system: a new immunohistochemical method for diagnostics and research. Critical comparison with the APAAP, ChemMate, CSA, LABC, and SABC techniques.Journal of clinical pathology · 1998Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The newly developed peroxidase-labelled Enhanced Polymer One-Step (EPOS) reagents were applied, together with an unlabelled primary mouse antibody, in a multistep double-labelling protocol. Enzyme label reporter combinations consisted of either peroxidase and alkaline phosphatase in red and blue, respectively, or beta-galactosidase and alkaline phosphatase in turquoise and red, respectively. The latter enzyme combination was introduced using a rabbit antiperoxidase antibody and an enzyme-labelled anti-rabbit immunoglobulin antibody. The multistep procedure was tested using five different antibody combinations on cryostat and Carnoy- or formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections. In each instance, clear and distinct labelling was obtained, either with the two antigens at separate sites, or with an overlap in distribution. In the latter situation, the sites of co-localization were marked by mixed colours, which were distinct and readily discriminated from the two basic colours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.