ArticleNucleic acids research1996
In vitro transcription of a poly(dA) x poly(dT)-containing sequence is inhibited by interaction between the template and its transcripts.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sequence features and transcriptional stalling within centromere DNA promote establishment of CENP-A chromatin.PLoS genetics · 2015Article
- Strong spurious transcription likely contributes to DNA insert bias in typical metagenomic clone libraries.Microbiome · 2015Article
- Poly(A) leader of eukaryotic mRNA bypasses the dependence of translation on initiation factors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008Article
- Transcription through a simple DNA repeat blocks replication elongation.The EMBO journal · 1998Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcription of poly(dA) x poly(dT)-containing sequences was investigated in vitro using plasmids carrying a (dA)34 x (dT)34 tract in the coding region of the lacZ gene. The efficiency of transcription of the (dT)34 sequence on the transcribing strand by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase was substantially lower (approximately 60%) than that of the (dA)34 sequence or of the control lacZ gene. Analysis of the transcription process of the (dT)34 sequence by T3 RNA polymerase showed that the transcription was frequently arrested or terminated at the middle as well as immediately proximal of the (dA)34 x (dT)34 tract, and it occurred more prominently following accumulation of transcription products. This inhibition was strongly enhanced by the addition of the oligonucleotide (dT)34 or poly(U) to the reaction mixture, while (dA)34 and the duplex (dA)34 x (dT)34 suppressed the inhibition. A similar transcriptional inhibition was also observed in transcription mediated by T7 RNA polymerase and eukaryotic RNA polymerase II. We also demonstrated RNA x DNA complex formation of the (dA)34 x (dT)34 tract with poly(U), but not with poly(A). These findings strongly suggest that poly(dT)-containing template sequences interact and form a complex with its transcription products, possibly an RNA x DNA triplex, which blocks further transcription. This would explain the instability of the plasmids transcribing mRNAs with poly(U) but not poly(A) tracts and the underrepresentation of poly(U) but not poly(A) tracts in mRNAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.