Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8947935›Full record

ReviewNeurochemical research1996

Feeding, drug abuse, and the sensitization of reward by metabolic need.

K D Carr

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurochemical research, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Drive and Reinforcement Circuitry in the Brain: Origins, Neurotransmitters, and Projection Fields.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Insulin signaling and addiction.Neuropharmacology · 2011
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Sucrose self-administration and CNS activation in the rat.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2011
    Article
  18. Energy regulatory signals and food reward.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2010
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

K D CarrDepartment of Psychiatry New York University Medical Center, New York 10016, USA.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

CNS OPIOID MECHANISMS THAT MODULATE REWARD AND AVERSIONR01DA003956 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CARR, KENNETH D · 1986 to 2018
$5.1M
CNS Mechanisms that Modulate RewardR56DA003956 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CARR, KENNETH D · 2008 to 2008
$321k
NIDA NIH HHS DA 03956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incentive-motivating effects of external stimuli are dependent, in part, upon the internal need state of the organism. The increased rewarding efficacy of food as a function of energy deficit, for example, has obvious adaptive value. The enhancement of food reward extends, however, to drugs of abuse and electrical brain stimulation, probably due to a shared neural substrate. Research reviewed in this paper uses lateral hypothalamic electrical stimulation to probe the sensitivity of the brain reward system and investigate mechanisms through which metabolic need, induced by chronic food restriction and streptozotocin-induced diabetes, sensitizes this system. Results indicate that sensitivity to rewarding brain stimulation varies inversely with declining body weight. The effect is not mimicked by pharmacological glucoprivation or lipoprivation in ad libitum fed animals; sensitization appears to depend on persistent metabolic need or adipose depletion. While the literature suggests elevated plasma corticosterone as a peripheral trigger of reward sensitization, sensitization was not reversed by meal-induced or pharmacological suppression of plasma corticosterone. Centrally, reward sensitization is mediated by opioid receptors, since the effect is reversed by intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) infusion of naltrexone, TCTAP (mu antagonist) and nor-binaltorphimine (kappa antagonist). The fact that these same treatments, as well as i.c.v. infusion of dynorphin A antiserum, block the feeding response to lateral hypothalamic stimulation suggests that feeding and reward sensitization are mediated by a common opioid mechanism. Using in vitro autoradiography, radioimmunoassays and a solution hybridization mRNA assay, brain regional mu and kappa opioid receptor binding, levels of prodynorphin-derived peptides, and prodynorphin mRNA, respectively, were measured in food-restricted and diabetic rats. Changes that could plausibly be involved in reward sensitization are discussed, with emphasis on the increased dynorphin A1-3 and prodynorphin mRNA levels in lateral hypothalamic neurons that innervate the pontine parabrachial nucleus, where mu binding decreased and kappa binding increased. Finally, the possible linkage between metabolic need and activation of a brain opioid mechanism is discussed, as is evidence supporting the relevance of these findings to drug abuse.

Indexed as

EatingFeeding BehaviorNarcoticsRewardAnimalsBrainHumansLearningRatsReceptors, OpioidSubstance-Related DisordersNarcoticsReceptors, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID8947935
OpenAlexW2010696716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.