Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8944613›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pathology1996

Prognostic role of oestrogen and progesterone receptors in patients with breast cancer: relation to age and lymph node status.

K Collett, F Hartveit, R Skjaerven, B O Maehle

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pathology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Incorporating progesterone receptor expression into the PREDICT breast prognostic model.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The enigmatic nature of apocrine breast lesions.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2006
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K CollettGade Institute, Department of Pathology, University of Bergen, Haukeland Hospital, Norway.
F Hartveit
R Skjaerven
B O Maehle
Haukeland University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo consider the prognostic role of oestrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status in relation to the age at surgery, length of follow up and lymph node status.

methodsThe study population comprised 977 patients with histologically confirmed breast carcinoma, with a median follow up of nine years. The actuarial life table method was used to test for survival differences. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to test for interaction effects between each hormone receptor and age, lymph node status and length of follow up. As the analysis involved multiple subgroups, significance was set at the 1% level (p < 0.01).

resultsWhen the patients were subdivided into groups according to lymph node status and age, progesterone and oestrogen receptor status predicted prognosis in middle aged (46-60 years) patients with lymph node positive breast cancer. Their prognostic effect in this subgroup, however, was restricted to the first five years after surgery. Progesterone receptor status was the strongest predictor of outcome.

conclusionThe prognostic power of oestrogen and progesterone receptor status varies depending on age, lymph node status and length of follow up after surgery.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneSurvival AnalysisReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID8944613
PMCPMC500833
OpenAlexW2108479296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.