Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8942955›Full record

ReviewProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1996

Toward a molecular definition of long-term memory storage.

C H Bailey, D Bartsch, E R Kandel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 209 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
209citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

209 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genes Responsible for HBiomolecules · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Making of Long-Lasting Memories: A Fruit Fly Perspective.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

149 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

C H BaileyHoward Hughes Medical Institute, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia, University, New York State Psychiatric Institute, NY 10032, USA.
D Bartsch
E R Kandel

Funding

MORPHOLOGICAL BASIS OF SYNAPTIC PLASTICITYR01MH037134 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE · PI BAILEY, CRAIG H · 1985 to 2003
$1.0M
SYNAPTIC PLASTICITY AT SENSORY SYNAPSESP01GM032099 · NIGMS · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE · PI KUPFERMANN, IRVING · 1985 to 1996
–
NIGMS NIH HHS GM32099NIMH NIH HHS MH37134NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH037134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The storage of long-term memory is associated with a cellular program of gene expression, altered protein synthesis, and the growth of new synaptic connections. Recent studies of a variety of memory processes, ranging in complexity from those produced by simple forms of implicit learning in invertebrates to those produced by more complex forms of explicit learning in mammals, suggest that part of the molecular switch required for consolidation of long-term memory is the activation of a cAMP-inducible cascade of genes and the recruitment of cAMP response element binding protein-related transcription factors. This conservation of steps in the mechanisms for learning-related synaptic plasticity suggests the possibility of a molecular biology of cognition.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionModels, NeurologicalAnimalsAplysiaCognitionCyclic AMPCyclic AMP Response Element-Binding ProteinDrosophilaGenes, Immediate-EarlyHippocampusLearningLong-Term PotentiationMammalsMemoryNeuronal PlasticityReflexCyclic AMPCyclic AMP Response Element-Binding Protein

Identifiers

PMID8942955
PMCPMC33629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.