Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8940449›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology1996

Development of two species-specific fingerprinting probes for broad computer-assisted epidemiological studies of Candida tropicalis.

S Joly, C Pujol, K Schröppel, D R Soll

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Contribution ofInfection and drug resistance · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Candidiasis during pregnancy may result from isogenic commensal strains.Infectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology · 2001
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Gut microbes
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S JolyDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242, USA.
C Pujol
K Schröppel
D R Soll
University of Iowa · US

Funding

ROLE OF ANTIOXIDANT ENZYMES IN ORAL CANCERP50DE010758 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI SWARTZENDRUBER, DONALD C · 1993 to 1998
–
NIAID NIH HHS AI2392NIDCR NIH HHS DE10758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candida tropicalis has emerged as the second most frequent colonizing Candida species, and it has been documented in nosocomial infections. To develop an effective fingerprinting system for this species, which is amenable to computer-assisted analyses and which provides information on the genetic relatedness of independent isolates, two DNA fragments, Ct3 (18,000 bp) and Ct14 (20,000 bp), were cloned from a genomic library of Sau3AI partial digestion products. Both probes generate complex Southern blot patterns containing 8 to 20 bands, when hybridized to EcoRI- or EcoRI-HaeIII-digested DNA of independent C. tropicalis isolates. The two probes show no cross-hybridization and are both species specific for C. tropicalis. A comparison of the capacity of the two probes to identify the same strain in different isolates, and differentiate unrelated strains, using computer-assisted computation of similarity coefficients and the genesis of dendrograms, suggests that while Ct14 is more effective in grouping independent isolates, Ct3 is more effective in discriminating small differences in the patterns of highly related isolates and is therefore a more effective probe for determining microevolution within a clonal population and substrain shuffling in recurrent infections. Because of their alternative attributes, it is suggested that both probes be used in fingerprinting studies of C. tropicalis.

Indexed as

DNA ProbesCandidaCandidiasisCloning, MolecularComputersDNA FingerprintingEvaluation Studies as TopicEvolution, MolecularHumansMolecular EpidemiologyPhenotypeRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidSpecies SpecificityDNA Probes

Identifiers

PMID8940449
PMCPMC229460
OpenAlexW2133214296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.