Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8940441›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical microbiology1996

Multicenter comparison of three commercial methods for quantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA in plasma.

R Schuurman, D Descamps, G J Weverling, S Kaye, J Tijnagel, I Williams, R van Leeuwen, R Tedder, C A Boucher, F Brun-Vezinet and 1 more

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Current practices in laboratory monitoring of HIV infection.The Indian journal of medical research · 2011
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Principles and applications of polymerase chain reaction in medical diagnostic fields: a review.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2009
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Molecular and diagnostic clinical virology in real time.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2004
    Review
  11. Clinical virology in real time.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2002
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Antigen-driven CD4+ T cell and HIV-1 dynamics: residual viral replication under highly active antiretroviral therapy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1999
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

R SchuurmanEijkman Winkler Institute for Medical Microbiology, Department of Virology, Utrecht University, The Netherlands. r.schuurman@lab.azu.nl
D Descamps
G J Weverling
S Kaye
J Tijnagel
I Williams
R van Leeuwen
R Tedder
C A Boucher
F Brun-Vezinet
C Loveday

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three procedures for the quantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA from plasma were compared at three laboratories. The comparison involved the Quantiplex branched DNA assay (version 1.0) by Chiron Diagnostics, the NASBA-QT assay by Organon Teknika, and the Amplicor Monitor assay by Roche Molecular Systems. The laboratories performed each of the three assays with the same sets of reconstructed HIV-1-infected human plasma samples, cross-sectionally collected clinical plasma samples and longitudinally collected plasma samples from patients starting zidovudine therapy. Analysis of the reconstruction panel results for interlaboratory variation demonstrated that no laboratory differences in results were detected for any of the assays. A comparison of the reproducibilities of duplicate samples analyzed by batch and in separate assay runs demonstrated that the reproducibilities of the test results were similar within one assay and appeared to be independent of the HIV-1 concentration. The best reproducibility was obtained with the Quantiplex assay, but all three assays demonstrated equal reliability, which was independent of batched or unbatched analysis of replicate samples. Differences in the absolute concentrations calculated were observed for the assays, in particular in the analysis of reconstructed samples. In all assays, similar changes in plasma HIV-1 RNA concentrations were determined for longitudinally collected clinical samples.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCross-Sectional StudiesHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansLaboratoriesLongitudinal StudiesReproducibility of ResultsRNA, ViralViremiaVirologyVirus ReplicationZidovudineBiomarkersRNA, ViralZidovudine

Identifiers

PMID8940441
PMCPMC229452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.